Pinpoint · Judgment search

Lithgow State Mine Railway Ltd v City of Greater Lithgow Mining Museum Inc

[2019] NSWSC 1131

Supreme Court of NSW · 2 September 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 3 indexed judgments

All Cited 3

2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2019 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Lithgow State Mine Railway Ltd v City of Greater Lithgow Mining Museum Inc (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1468 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Lithgow State Mine Railway Ltd v City of Greater Lithgow Mining Museum Inc (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 35 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Tutzing Pty Ltd v Upper Lachlan Shire Council [2021] NSWSC 1221 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (6)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Thomson v Richardson (1928) 29 SR (NSW) 221 Applied or followed cited 2×
  2. Godfrey Constructions Pty Ltd v Kanangra Park Pty Ltd [1972] HCA 36 Cited cited 26×
  3. Qantas Airways Ltd v AF Little Pty Ltd [1981] 2 NSWLR 34 Cited cited 26×
  4. John Alexander's Clubs Pty Limited v White City Tennis Club Limited [2010] HCA 19 Cited cited 299×
  5. Ross v Lane Cove Council [2014] NSWCA 50 Cited cited 100×
  6. Boyd v Thorn [2017] NSWCA 210 Cited cited 23×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.