Pinpoint · Judgment search

Alam v Giampietro trading as Legal & Company Solicitors

[2023] NSWDC 454

District Court of NSW · 27 October 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (19)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Sanderson v Blyth Theatre Co [1903] 2 KB 533 Cited cited 102×
  2. Bullock v London General Omnibus Co [1907] 1 KB 264 Cited cited 93×
  3. Johnsons Tyne Foundry Pty Ltd v Maffra Corporation [1948] HCA 46 Cited cited 44×
  4. Trade Practices Commission v Nicholas Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 3) [1979] FCA 143 Cited cited 180×
  5. Gould v Vaggelas [1985] HCA 75 Cited cited 434×
  6. Gould v Vaggelas [1985] HCA 85 Cited cited 53×
  7. Lackersteen v Jones (No 2) [1988] NTSC 72 Cited cited 62×
  8. STEVEDORING INDUSTRY FINANCE COMMITTEE v RONALD J GIBSON & 4 ORS [2000] NSWCA 179 Cited cited 48×
  9. Rushcutters Bay Smash Repairs v H McKenna Netmakers & Ors [2003] NSWSC 670 Cited cited 23×
  10. City of Swan v Lehman Bros Australia Ltd (No 3) [2009] FCA 1190 Cited cited 7×
  11. Council of the City of Liverpool v Turano [No 2] [2009] NSWCA 176 Cited cited 43×
  12. DOMINELLO v DOMINELLO & ANOR; DOMINELLO v THE NOMINAL DEFENDANT & ANOR [NO 2] [2009] NSWCA 257 Cited cited 12×
  13. Tomasetti v Brailey [2012] NSWSC 120 Cited cited 6×
  14. Perigo v Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer and Anor (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 6 Cited cited 7×
  15. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v ActiveSuper Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2015] FCA 527 Cited cited 11×
  16. Sze Tu v Lowe (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 91 Cited cited 104×
  17. Royal v El Ali (No 3) [2016] FCA 1573 Cited cited 24×
  18. Northern Territory v Sangare [2019] HCA 25 Cited cited 200×
  19. Alam v Giampietro [2020] NSWDC 471 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.