Pinpoint · Judgment search

Toogood v Spyring

(1834) 149 ER 1044

1834 · Find the judgment

Cited by 14 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 13

2005: 1 citing judgment 2008: 1 citing judgment 2009: 2 citing judgments 2011: 2 citing judgments 2015: 1 citing judgment 2017: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 2 citing judgments 2023: 1 citing judgment 2025: 1 citing judgment 1834 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. MOIT v. BRISTOW [2005] NSWCA 322 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 19× · judgment
  2. Lindholdt v Hyer [2008] NSWCA 264 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 24× · judgment
  3. Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation Limited [2009] NSWCA 9 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 22× · judgment
  4. PAPACONSTUNTINOS v HOLMES À COURT [2009] NSWSC 903 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 14× · judgment
  5. LVMH Watch & Jewellery Australia Pty Limited v Michael Lassanah & Ors [2011] NSWCA 370 Applied or followed NSW Court of Appeal · cited 13× · judgment
  6. The Korean Times Pty Ltd & Anor v Un Dok Pak [2011] NSWCA 365 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  7. Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited [2015] FCA 652 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 60× · judgment
  8. Collier v Country Women’s Association of NSW [2017] NSWSC 1573 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 7× · judgment
  9. Bailey v WIN Television NSW Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 352 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  10. Rader v Haines [2021] NSWDC 610 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  11. Palmer v McGowan (No 5) [2022] FCA 893 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 18× · judgment
  12. Burston v Hanson [2022] FCA 1235 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  13. Russell v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (No 3) [2023] FCA 1223 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 10× · judgment
  14. Thurston v Fox Sports Australia Pty Limited [2025] FCA 54 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.