Pinpoint · Judgment search

The Korean Times Pty Ltd & Anor v Un Dok Pak

[2011] NSWCA 365

NSW Court of Appeal · 30 November 2011 · Official judgment

Cited by 5 indexed judgments

All Cited 5

2012: 1 citing judgment 2013: 2 citing judgments 2015: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2011 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Daily Examiner Pty Ltd v Mundine; Brown v Mundine [2012] NSWCA 195 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 11× · judgment
  2. Marshall v Megna; Megna v Tory; Tory v Megna [2013] NSWCA 30 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 23× · judgment
  3. Enders v Erbas & Associates Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2013] NSWDC 44 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  4. Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited [2015] FCA 652 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 60× · judgment
  5. KSMC Holdings Pty Ltd t/as Hubba Bubba Childcare on Haig v Bowden [2020] NSWCA 28 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 19× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (36)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Toogood v Spyring (1834) 149 ER 1044 Cited cited 14×
  2. Adam v Ward [1917] AC 309 Cited cited 82×
  3. Lang v Willis [1934] HCA 51 Cited cited 11×
  4. Ley v Hamilton (1935) 153 LT 384 Cited cited 25×
  5. Loveday v Sun Newspapers Ltd [1938] HCA 28 Cited cited 42×
  6. Guise v Kouvelis [1947] HCA 13 Cited cited 42×
  7. Braddock v Bevins [1948] 1 KB 580 Cited cited 10×
  8. Triggell v Pheeney [1951] HCA 23 Cited cited 117×
  9. Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1963] 1 QB 340 Cited cited 9×
  10. Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1964] AC 234 Cited cited 148×
  11. Rigby v Associated Newspapers Ltd [1969] 1 NSWR 729 Cited cited 15×
  12. Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome [1972] UKHL 3 Cited cited 172×
  13. Morosi v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1977] 2 NSWLR 749 Cited cited 78×
  14. Mirror Newspapers Ltd v World Hosts Pty Ltd [1979] HCA 3 Cited cited 60×
  15. Bickel v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1981] 2 NSWLR 474 Cited cited 39×
  16. (1985) 1 NSWLR 58 Cited cited 57×
  17. Austin v Mirror Newspapers Ltd (1985) 3 NSWLR 354 Cited cited 51×
  18. Austin v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1986] AC 299 Cited cited 20×
  19. Stephens v West Australian Newspapers Ltd [1994] HCA 45 Cited cited 74×
  20. Theophanous v Herald & Weekly Times Ltd [1994] HCA 46 Cited cited 110×
  21. Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [1997] HCA 25 Cited cited 344×
  22. Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden [1998] NSWSC 4 Cited cited 226×
  23. Assaf v Skalkos [2000] NSWSC 418 Cited cited 7×
  24. Roberts v Bass [2002] HCA 57 Cited cited 167×
  25. THEODORE SKALKOS & ANOR v JOSEPH ASSAF & ANOR [2002] NSWCA 14 Cited cited 30×
  26. John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Rivkin [2003] HCA 50 Cited cited 111×
  27. Rogers v Nationwide News Pty Limited [2003] HCA 52 Cited cited 116×
  28. Bashford v Information Australia (Newsletters) Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 5 Applied or followed cited 102×
  29. Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 52 Cited cited 162×
  30. Malcolm v Nationwide News Pty Limited [2007] NSWCA 254 Cited cited 31×
  31. Ali v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 183 Cited cited 65×
  32. Bennette v Cohen [2009] NSWCA 60 Cited cited 39×
  33. Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation Limited [2010] HCA 25 Cited cited 36×
  34. Cush v Dillon [2011] HCA 30 Applied or followed cited 42×
  35. Trad v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 61 Cited cited 10×
  36. Robbie Waterhouse v The Age Company Ltd & Ors; Robbie Waterhouse v Fairfax Media Pty Ltd & Anor; Robbie Waterhouse v Fairfax Digital Australia & New Zealand Pty Ltd & Ors [2011] NSWSC 159 Cited cited 10×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.