Pinpoint · Judgment search

Broadbridge v Stammers

(1987) 16 FCR 296

1987 · Find the judgment

Cited by 22 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 4 Cited 18

1995: 2 citing judgments 1997: 2 citing judgments 1998: 4 citing judgments 1999: 2 citing judgments 2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 1 citing judgment 2009: 1 citing judgment 2010: 4 citing judgments 2011: 1 citing judgment 2012: 1 citing judgment 2014: 1 citing judgment 2019: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 1987 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 2,785× · judgment
  2. Right to Life Association (NSW) Inc v Secretary Department of Human Services & Health & Anor [1995] FCA 33 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 34× · judgment
  3. Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Teo, D. [1995] FCA 246 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 74× · judgment
  4. Edwards, Hugh Andrew John v Australian Securities Commission & Ors [1997] FCA 38 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  5. Byron Environment Centre Inc v The Arakwal People [1997] FCA 797 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 85× · judgment
  6. Allan, Peter v Development Allowance Authority [1998] FCA 112 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  7. Re: Application for a review of the Determination of the Australian Competition [1998] ACompT 1 [1998] ACOMPT 1 Cited Australian Competition Tribunal · judgment
  8. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (a firm) & Ors v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [1998] FCA 1439 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  9. Holland v Commissioner of Taxation [1999] FCA 1125 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  10. Xu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1741 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 53× · judgment
  11. Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Australian Lock Company Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 203 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  12. CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union and Anor v Commonwealth of Australia [2006] FCA 1589 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  13. Lamason v Australian Fisheries Management Authority [2009] FCA 245 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  14. Anderson v Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts [2010] FCA 57 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  15. Bukorovic v The Registrar of the WCC [2010] NSWSC 507 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  16. Strbac v QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited [2010] NSWSC 602 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  17. Leanne O'Shannessy & Department of Health Ltd v Blacktown Workers Club [2010] NSWSC 1153 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  18. Kutlu v Director of Professional Services Review [2011] FCAFC 94 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 11× · judgment
  19. Watson v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority [2012] FCAFC 142 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 14× · judgment
  20. Kolundzic v Quickflex Constructions Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1523 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 6× · judgment
  21. Jabbour v Secretary, Department of Home Affairs [2019] FCA 452 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 23× · judgment
  22. Davis v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 213 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 25× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.