Pinpoint · Judgment search

Rahman v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs

[2000] FCA 1277

Federal Court of Australia · 8 September 2000 · Official judgment

Cited by 37 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 1 Applied or followed 5 Cited 31

2000: 5 citing judgments 2001: 11 citing judgments 2002: 4 citing judgments 2003: 2 citing judgments, 1 negative 2004: 3 citing judgments 2005: 3 citing judgments 2007: 1 citing judgment 2009: 1 citing judgment 2018: 3 citing judgments 2019: 3 citing judgments 2020: 1 citing judgment 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Ahamed v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1325 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  2. Khatter v Minister of Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1338 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Anthonypillai v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1368 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 18× · judgment
  4. Pollocks v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1514 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  5. Mazhar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1759 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 52× · judgment
  6. Sarker v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 190 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  7. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai [2001] FCA 274 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 128× · judgment
  8. Agyei v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 481 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  9. Singh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 390 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  10. Masood v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 405 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  11. Algama v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 476 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  12. Ahmed v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 506 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 14× · judgment
  13. W41/01A v Minister For Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 742 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  14. Awan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1036 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 10× · judgment
  15. Ghojavand v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1336 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  16. Abeysinghe v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1201 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  17. Azzi v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 24 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 19× · judgment
  18. Videla v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 233 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  19. NABM of 2001 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 335 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment
  20. Tran v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 1522 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 9× · judgment
  21. Applicants S61 of 2002 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2003] FCA 1274 Distinguished Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  22. Applicant M17 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1364 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  23. M159 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 131 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  24. M159 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 426 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  25. MZKAH v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1589 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  26. M17/2004 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 86 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  27. Hill v Repatriation Commission [2005] FCAFC 23 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 26× · judgment
  28. SWPB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 850 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  29. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Le [2007] FCA 1318 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 84× · judgment
  30. Khant v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1247 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 11× · judgment
  31. Frugtniet v Tax Practitioners Board [2018] FCA 387 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  32. CXJ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 391 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  33. BDS17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1683 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  34. Ozer v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 104 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  35. Tang v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 497 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  36. Frugtniet v Tax Practitioners Board [2019] FCAFC 193 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 3× · judgment
  37. Webb v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 831 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 9× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (20)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8 Cited cited 2,918×
  2. Turner v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1981] FCA 65 Applied or followed cited 54×
  3. Prasad v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155 Applied or followed cited 286×
  4. Videto v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1985] FCA 449 Applied or followed cited 45×
  5. Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81 Cited cited 1,205×
  6. Luu v Renevier [1989] FCA 518 Cited cited 156×
  7. Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×
  8. Detsongjarus v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1990) 21 ALD 139 Applied or followed cited 10×
  9. Dornan v Riordan [1990] FCA 383 Cited cited 116×
  10. Enichem Anic Srl v Anti-Dumping Authority (1992) 111 ALR 178 Applied or followed cited 4×
  11. Fuduche v Minister for Immigration Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 45 FCR 515 Cited cited 27×
  12. Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Teo, D. [1995] FCA 246 Cited cited 74×
  13. Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh [1995] HCA 20 Cited cited 502×
  14. Huang v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 71 FCR 95 Cited cited 17×
  15. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Singh (1997) 74 FCR 553 Cited cited 58×
  16. Comcare Australia v Lees, Victor John Lees, Victor John v Comcare Australia [1997] FCA 1415 Cited cited 45×
  17. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [1999] FCA 1681 Cited cited 53×
  18. Xu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1741 Cited cited 53×
  19. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Cited cited 971×
  20. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Singh [2000] FCA 845 Applied or followed cited 231×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.