Pinpoint · Judgment search

Ullah v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs

[2002] FCA 60

Federal Court of Australia · 8 February 2002 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 3

2002: 1 citing judgment 2003: 2 citing judgments 2004: 1 citing judgment 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Kamal v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 818 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  2. M v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] FCA 1185 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Rahmatullah v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1573 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  4. Rahmatullah v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 200 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (14)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 29 Cited cited 7×
  2. Waterford v Commonwealth [1987] HCA 25 Cited cited 456×
  3. Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 Cited cited 185×
  4. Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×
  5. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  6. Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Guo Wei Rong [1997] HCA 22 Applied or followed cited 776×
  7. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam [1999] FCA 719 Applied or followed cited 297×
  8. Abebe v Commonwealth [1999] HCA 14 Applied or followed cited 844×
  9. Awan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1036 Applied or followed cited 10×
  10. Khan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 736 Cited cited 17×
  11. Capa v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 898 Cited cited 6×
  12. Chhour v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 911 Applied or followed cited 11×
  13. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Cohen [2001] HCA 10 Cited cited 63×
  14. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 Applied or followed cited 1,750×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.