Pinpoint · Judgment search

Ahmed v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

[2001] FCA 506 ; (2001) 184 ALR 343

Federal Court of Australia · 4 May 2001 · Official judgment

Cited by 14 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 3 Cited 11

2001: 5 citing judgments 2002: 2 citing judgments 2003: 1 citing judgment 2014: 1 citing judgment 2016: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 2 citing judgments 2023: 1 citing judgment 2001 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Hernandez v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 725 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  2. Chen v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1099 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Abdul Raheem v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 940 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  4. Abujoudeh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1351 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  5. Liu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1362 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 33× · judgment
  6. Azzi v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 24 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 19× · judgment
  7. Dissanayake v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 976 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  8. M152 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1415 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  9. WZARH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 137 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 6× · judgment
  10. AEK15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 131 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 7× · judgment
  11. Frugtniet v Tax Practitioners Board [2018] FCA 387 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  12. CHZ19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 914 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 14× · judgment
  13. Frugtniet v Tax Practitioners Board [2019] FCAFC 193 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 3× · judgment
  14. Jarvis-Lavery v Commissioner of Taxation [2023] FCA 1382 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (13)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 Cited cited 185×
  2. Yao-Jing Li v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1997] FCA 289 Cited cited 32×
  3. Yusuf v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 58 ALD 470 Cited cited 3×
  4. Sellamuthu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 247 Distinguished cited 170×
  5. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam [2000] FCA 1023 Cited cited 27×
  6. Rahman v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1277 Cited cited 37×
  7. Al Shamry v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1679 Not followed cited 7×
  8. Majeed v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 470 Cited cited 20×
  9. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Indatissa [2001] FCA 181 Cited cited 64×
  10. Kabir & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 248 Cited cited 5×
  11. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai [2001] FCA 274 Cited cited 128×
  12. Rajanayake v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 352 Applied or followed
  13. Liu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 49 Applied or followed cited 5×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.