Pinpoint · Judgment search

SZQYM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2)

[2020] FCA 979

Federal Court of Australia · 13 July 2020 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. FCV18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1006 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. EIL18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2022] FCA 926 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (9)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Khant v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1247 Cited cited 11×
  2. Snedden v Republic of Croatia (No 2) [2009] FCAFC 132 Cited cited 13×
  3. Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v ALS Industrial Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 166 Cited cited 15×
  4. Summers v Repatriation Commission (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 64 Cited cited 29×
  5. BCH17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 300 Cited cited 8×
  6. CED16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2019] FCA 438 Cited cited 2×
  7. SZQYN v Minister for Home Affairs & Anor [2019] FCCA 489 Cited cited 2×
  8. SZQYM & Anor v Minister for Home Affairs & Anor [2019] FCCA 490 Cited cited 2×
  9. SZQYM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 779 Cited cited 21×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.