Pinpoint · Judgment search

CAQ18 v Minister for Home Affairs

[2019] FCA 603

Federal Court of Australia · 2 May 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2019: 1 citing judgment 2019 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Nyoni v Beadle in her Capacity as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Emson Clever Nyoni [2019] FCA 1116 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (24)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Public Service Board of New South Wales v Osmond [1986] HCA 7 Cited cited 336×
  2. Selvadurai v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1994] FCA 301 Applied or followed cited 15×
  3. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6 Cited cited 918×
  4. SZCOQ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2007] FCAFC 9 Cited cited 10×
  5. SZLGP v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1470 Cited cited 57×
  6. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT [2013] FCA 317 Cited cited 393×
  7. SZRSN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 751 Cited cited 7×
  8. MZYWL v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship [2013] FCA 895 Cited cited 4×
  9. SZRUI v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship [2013] FCAFC 80 Cited cited 55×
  10. SZSHV v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 253 Cited cited 51×
  11. AAM15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 804 Cited cited 80×
  12. CQG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 146 Cited cited 243×
  13. AMF15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 68 Cited cited 45×
  14. DTG16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 143 Cited cited 2×
  15. BDS17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1683 Cited cited 8×
  16. EGN17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1810 Cited
  17. DQA16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 2086 Cited cited 6×
  18. COZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 46 Cited cited 31×
  19. AXE16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 646 Cited cited 2×
  20. CIT17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 150 Cited cited 22×
  21. DAO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 2 Cited cited 167×
  22. Yaacoub v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 39 Cited cited 10×
  23. DFC16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 56 Cited cited 8×
  24. CAQ18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCCA 2302 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.