Pinpoint · Judgment search

Hinton v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

[2015] FCA 408 ; (2015) 146 ALD 184

Federal Court of Australia · 1 May 2015 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Cited 4

2016: 2 citing judgments 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2015 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. BFC15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 735 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  2. El Saghir v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1430 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Makarov v Minister for Home Affairs (No 3) [2020] FCA 1655 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  4. DIN20 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 331 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (21)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Tickner v Chapman (1995) 57 FCR 451 Cited cited 243×
  2. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Applied or followed cited 2,712×
  3. Singh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1234 Cited cited 8×
  4. Rezaei v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1294 Cited cited 30×
  5. Thirukkumar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 268 Cited cited 24×
  6. Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184 Cited cited 654×
  7. NABE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263 Cited cited 637×
  8. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Lay Lat [2006] FCAFC 61 Cited cited 89×
  9. SZCIJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs & Anor [2006] FCAFC 62 Cited cited 38×
  10. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Le [2007] FCA 1318 Cited cited 84×
  11. Khant v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1247 Cited cited 11×
  12. Aporo v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCAFC 123 Cited cited 12×
  13. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39 Cited cited 538×
  14. MZXSA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCAFC 123 Cited cited 34×
  15. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZNPG [2010] FCAFC 51 Cited cited 92×
  16. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZRTF [2013] FCA 1377 Cited cited 11×
  17. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT [2013] FCA 317 Cited cited 393×
  18. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS [2013] FCAFC 114 Cited cited 248×
  19. SZTDX v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 515 Cited cited 3×
  20. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSRS [2014] FCAFC 16 Cited cited 142×
  21. Hinton v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2014] FCCA 2505 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.