Pinpoint · Judgment search

Algama v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

[2001] FCA 476

Federal Court of Australia · 27 April 2001 · Official judgment

Cited by 8 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 6

2001: 3 citing judgments 2002: 4 citing judgments 2003: 1 citing judgment 2001 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Algama v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1884 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 17× · judgment
  2. Mulla v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 934 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Chen v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1671 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment
  4. Chaddha v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 92 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  5. Dissanayake v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 976 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  6. Ngu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 998 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  7. Tran v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 1522 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 9× · judgment
  8. Heap, in the matter of an Application for Writs of Prohibition, Certiorari and Mandamus against the Australian Industrial Relations Commission [2003] FCAFC 36 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (31)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Ex parte Hebburn Ltd; Re Kearsley Shire Council [1947] NSWStRp 24 Cited cited 118×
  2. Sinclair v Maryborough Mining Warden [1975] HCA 17 Cited cited 107×
  3. in The Queen v Watson; Ex parte Armstrong (1976) 136 CLR 249 Cited
  4. Barton v Walker [1979] 2 NSWLR 740 Cited cited 58×
  5. Rajski v Wood (1989) 18 NSWLR 512 Cited cited 35×
  6. R v Rogerson (1990) 45 A Crim R 253 Cited cited 27×
  7. Dodds v Comcare Australia (1993) 31 ALD 690 Cited cited 35×
  8. Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×
  9. Yao v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 69 FCR 583 Applied or followed cited 18×
  10. Jayasinghe, Shantha Karunaratna v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs & Anor [1997] FCA 551 Applied or followed cited 34×
  11. Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Guo Wei Rong [1997] HCA 22 Applied or followed cited 776×
  12. Paramananthan, Kirushanthan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Sivarasa, Vijayakumar [1998] FCA 1693 Cited cited 126×
  13. Arudselvan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1726 Cited cited 19×
  14. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Capitly [1999] FCA 193 Cited cited 25×
  15. Sellamuthu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 247 Applied or followed cited 170×
  16. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam [1999] FCA 719 Applied or followed cited 297×
  17. K v Domestic Violence Crisis Service Inc [1999] FCA 794 Applied or followed cited 4×
  18. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Cho [1999] FCA 946 Applied or followed cited 31×
  19. Ex parte Durairajasingham (2000) 169 ALR 407 Cited
  20. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Mohammad [2000] FCA 1275 Applied or followed cited 18×
  21. Rahman v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1277 Cited cited 37×
  22. Anthonypillai v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1368 Not followed cited 18×
  23. Xiao v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1472 Applied or followed cited 19×
  24. Mohammed v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 264 Applied or followed cited 15×
  25. Majeed v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 470 Cited cited 20×
  26. De Silva v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 765 Cited cited 18×
  27. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Singh [2000] FCA 845 Applied or followed cited 231×
  28. Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×
  29. Ebner v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63 Cited cited 1,161×
  30. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai [2001] FCA 274 Applied or followed cited 128×
  31. Win v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 56 Cited cited 49×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.