Pinpoint · Judgment search

Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd (in liq) v Darling Harbour Authority

(1991) 24 NSWLR 156

1991 · Find the judgment

Cited by 146 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 1 Applied or followed 9 Cited 136

1995: 4 citing judgments 1996: 1 citing judgment 1997: 2 citing judgments 1998: 3 citing judgments 1999: 6 citing judgments 2000: 2 citing judgments 2001: 4 citing judgments 2002: 1 citing judgment 2003: 5 citing judgments 2004: 2 citing judgments 2005: 11 citing judgments, 1 negative 2006: 10 citing judgments 2007: 10 citing judgments 2008: 5 citing judgments 2009: 8 citing judgments 2010: 5 citing judgments 2011: 4 citing judgments 2012: 3 citing judgments 2013: 3 citing judgments 2014: 3 citing judgments 2015: 3 citing judgments 2016: 5 citing judgments 2017: 8 citing judgments 2018: 5 citing judgments 2019: 5 citing judgments 2020: 3 citing judgments 2021: 6 citing judgments 2022: 2 citing judgments 2023: 10 citing judgments 2024: 7 citing judgments 1991 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Ainger v Coffs Harbour City Council [2005] NSWCA 424 Distinguished NSW Court of Appeal · cited 25× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.