Pinpoint · Judgment search

Anderson v The Queen

(1993) 177 CLR 520

1993 · Find the judgment

Cited by 10 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 1 Cited 9

1999: 4 citing judgments 2000: 1 citing judgment, 1 negative 2001: 1 citing judgment 2004: 1 citing judgment 2006: 2 citing judgments 2018: 1 citing judgment 1993 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 1,119× · judgment
  2. Inge v The Queen [1999] HCA 55 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  3. The Queen v Griggs [1999] FCA 1573 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  4. R v Tran [1999] NSWCCA 443 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  5. Watson v The Queen [2000] FCA 186 Distinguished Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  6. Environment Protection Authority v BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Limited [2001] NSWLEC 214 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  7. Environment Protection Authority v BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Limited [2004] NSWLEC 37 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  8. Inspector MacKenzie v Fujifilm Australia Pty Ltd (ACN 000 064 433) (formerly Hanimex Pty Limited) [2006] NSWIRComm 74 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · judgment
  9. Inspector Marilyn Lewis v Northern Sydney and Central Coast Area Health Service [2006] NSWIRComm 61 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  10. Secretary, Department of Planning and Environment v Shoalhaven Starches Pty Ltd [2018] NSWLEC 23 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.