Pinpoint · Judgment search

Steer v The Queen

[2000] FCA 462 ; (2000) 171 ALR 463 ; (2000) 57 ACSR 445

Federal Court of Australia · 11 April 2000 · Official judgment

Cited by 7 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 6

2001: 1 citing judgment 2002: 1 citing judgment 2004: 1 citing judgment 2010: 2 citing judgments 2012: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Culshaw v The Queen [2001] FCA 1590 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. San Gabriel v The Queen [2002] FCAFC 169 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · judgment
  3. R v Salcedo [2004] NSWCCA 430 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  4. R v Guo; R v Qian [2010] NSWCCA 170 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 21× · judgment
  5. R (Cth) v Nguyen; R (Cth) v Nguyen [2010] NSWCCA 331 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 14× · judgment
  6. In the matter of K.G.B. Export Pty Limited [2012] NSWSC 1077 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  7. MO v R [2023] NSWCCA 26 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (31)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v D'Ortenzio [1961] VR 432 Applied or followed
  2. Griffiths v The Queen [1977] HCA 44 Cited cited 233×
  3. R v Tait and Bartley (1979) 24 ALR 473 Cited cited 53×
  4. R v Charles [1979] VR 8 Cited
  5. R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212 Cited cited 57×
  6. R v Tisalandis [1982] 2 NSWLR 430 Applied or followed cited 26×
  7. R v Holder [1983] 3 NSWLR 245 Applied or followed cited 196×
  8. Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46 Applied or followed cited 738×
  9. Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) [1984] HCA 7 Applied or followed cited 215×
  10. R v Hayes (1987) 29 A Crim R 452 Cited cited 18×
  11. Malvaso v The Queen [1989] HCA 58 Cited cited 106×
  12. R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 Cited cited 236×
  13. R v Cox (1991) 55 A Crim R 396 Cited cited 6×
  14. R v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561 Cited cited 158×
  15. Everett v The Queen [1994] HCA 49 Applied or followed cited 214×
  16. R v Radloff (1996) 6 Tas R 99 Cited
  17. R v Reardon (1996) 89 A Crim R 180 Cited cited 22×
  18. R v Clarke [1996] 2 VR 520 Cited cited 12×
  19. R v Isaacs (1997) 90 A Crim R 587 Cited cited 53×
  20. R v Kalajzich (1997) 94 A Crim R 41 Cited cited 39×
  21. Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26 Cited cited 816×
  22. R v Storey (1998) 1 VR 359 Applied or followed cited 7×
  23. DPP v Carter [1998] 1 VR 601 Cited cited 2×
  24. Inge v The Queen (1999) 166 ALR 312 Cited cited 2×
  25. Inge v The Queen [1999] 166 ALR 312 Applied or followed
  26. The Queen v Blaskovic [1999] FCA 1306 Cited cited 5×
  27. Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29 Cited cited 405×
  28. R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54 Applied or followed cited 1,119×
  29. DPP v Christie [1999] VSCA 151 Cited
  30. DPP v Christie [1999] VSCA 171 Applied or followed
  31. Watson v The Queen [2000] FCA 186 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.