Pinpoint · Judgment search

Fidoto Pty Limited v Inspector Patton

[2010] NSWIRComm 171 ; (2010) 200 IR 41

Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · 1 December 2010 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2012: 1 citing judgment 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Inspector Spence v Austar Constructions Pty Ltd [2012] NSWIRComm 114 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (14)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Channon v The Queen [1978] FCA 16 Cited cited 20×
  2. Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46 Cited cited 738×
  3. R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 Cited cited 195×
  4. Lowe v The Queen (1994) 154 CLR 606 Cited cited 17×
  5. Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26 Cited cited 816×
  6. Warman International Limited v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (1998) 80 IR 326 Cited cited 119×
  7. Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57 Cited cited 1,558×
  8. Siganto v The Queen [1998] HCA 74 Cited cited 173×
  9. REGINA v HENRY BARBER TRAN SILVER TSOUKATOS KYROGLOU JENKINS [1999] NSWCCA 111 Cited cited 1,285×
  10. R v STAHL [1999] NSWCCA 160 Cited cited 16×
  11. WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Insector Petar Ankucic) v McDonald's Australia Limited and Another [2000] NSWIRComm 277 Cited cited 243×
  12. Capral Aluminium Limited v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2000] NSWIRComm 71 Cited cited 775×
  13. R v Salcedo [2004] NSWCCA 430 Cited cited 5×
  14. Carroll v The Queen [2009] HCA 13 Cited cited 82×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.