Pinpoint · Judgment search

Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Respondent A

(1995) 57 FCR 309

1995 · Find the judgment

Cited by 12 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 11

1997: 1 citing judgment 1998: 2 citing judgments 1999: 2 citing judgments 2000: 1 citing judgment 2001: 4 citing judgments 2002: 1 citing judgment 2012: 1 citing judgment 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. A v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1997] HCA 4 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 414× · judgment
  2. Dan, Adrian v Minster for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 20 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Z v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 1578 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  4. Arumugasamy v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1554 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  5. Lama v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1620 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  6. Wang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1599 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 40× · judgment
  7. Kesic v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 130 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  8. Industry Research & Development Board v Bridgestone Australia Ltd [2001] FCA 954 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 26× · judgment
  9. Aala v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1015 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  10. Weheliye v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1222 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  11. WAAJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 409 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 11× · judgment
  12. Tinkerbell Enterprises Pty Limited as Trustee for The Leanne Catelan Trust v Takeovers Panel [2012] FCA 1272 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.