Pinpoint · Judgment search

James v Robinson

[1963] HCA 32 ; (1963) 109 CLR 593

High Court of Australia · 1963 · Find the judgment

Cited by 17 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 16

1998: 2 citing judgments 1999: 1 citing judgment 2002: 1 citing judgment 2003: 2 citing judgments 2006: 2 citing judgments 2007: 1 citing judgment 2009: 1 citing judgment 2010: 1 citing judgment 2011: 1 citing judgment 2014: 2 citing judgments 2017: 2 citing judgments 2018: 1 citing judgment 1963 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Re Colina; Ex parte Torney [1999] HCA 57 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 93× · judgment
  2. Oates, Anthony Gordon v The Honourable Daryl Williams QC in his Capacity as Attorney-General & Anor [1998] FCA 775 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 16× · judgment
  3. Health Insurance Commission & Anor v Freeman, Jack & Ors [1998] FCA 1340 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 23× · judgment
  4. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v INFO4PC.com Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 949 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 53× · judgment
  5. Hellenic Republic v Tzatzimakis [2003] FCAFC 4 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 7× · judgment
  6. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v World Netsafe Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1501 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 22× · judgment
  7. Clark v State of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 673 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 37× · judgment
  8. Seymour v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2006] FCA 965 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  9. X v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority [2007] HCA 4 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 23× · judgment
  10. Nuclear Utility Technology & Environmental Corporation Inc v Australian Broadcasting Corporation; on the application of Bayliss v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2009] NSWSC 78 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment
  11. GG v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 230 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 13× · judgment
  12. ASIC v Sigalla (No. 4) [2011] NSWSC 62 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 47× · judgment
  13. Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Yau Hang Chan (No 6) [2014] NSWSC 153 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  14. Tate v Duncan-Strelec [2014] NSWSC 1125 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  15. Mirus Australia Pty Ltd v Gage [2017] NSWSC 1046 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 22× · judgment
  16. Live Group Pty Ltd and Anor v Rabbi Ulman and Ors [2017] NSWSC 1759 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  17. Ulman v Live Group Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 338 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 7× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.