Pinpoint · Judgment search

Hellenic Republic v Tzatzimakis

[2003] FCAFC 4 ; (2003) 127 FCR 130

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · 31 January 2003 · Official judgment

Cited by 7 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 6

2003: 1 citing judgment 2004: 1 citing judgment 2012: 1 citing judgment 2013: 1 citing judgment 2014: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2003 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Dutton v O'Shane [2003] FCAFC 195 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 24× · judgment
  2. McCrea v Minister for Customs & Justice [2004] FCA 1273 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  3. Adamas v The Honourable Brendan O'Connor (No 2) [2012] FCA 227 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  4. Honourable Brendan O'Connor v Adamas [2013] FCAFC 14 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 8× · judgment
  5. Kommatas v Hellenic Republic [2014] FCA 1224 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  6. ZYVZ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 28 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  7. Coates-Kelly v New Zealand [2022] FCAFC 131 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (26)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. (1866) 2 Ch App 47 Cited cited 2×
  2. [1866] 2 Ch App 47 Cited
  3. (1910) 4 Cr App R 74 Cited
  4. Zachariassen v The Commonwealth (1917) 24 CLR 166 Cited cited 8×
  5. Harris v Cooke (1918) 88 LJKB 253 Cited cited 3×
  6. R v Industrial Acceptance Corporation [1953] 4 DLR 369 Cited
  7. R v Governor of Brixton Prison; Ex parte Caborn-Waterfield [1960] 2 QB 498 Cited cited 2×
  8. James v Robinson [1963] HCA 32 Cited cited 17×
  9. R v Tonks [1963] VR 121 Cited cited 12×
  10. Royal Government of Greece v Governor of Brixton Prison [1971] AC 250 Cited cited 7×
  11. Griffiths v The Queen [1977] HCA 44 Cited cited 233×
  12. R v Sarasin (1978) 11 AR 13 Cited
  13. Frodsham v O'Gorman [1979] NSWLR 683 Cited
  14. R v Governor of Pentonville Prison; Ex parte Zezza [1983] 1 AC 46 Applied or followed cited 2×
  15. Collozza v Italy (1985) 7 EHRR 516 Cited
  16. Wiest v Director of Public Prosecutions [1988] FCA 450 Not followed cited 70×
  17. Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) v McCoid [1988] VR 982 Cited cited 7×
  18. Poitrimol v France (1993) 18 EHRR 130 Cited
  19. Della Patrona v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (No 2) (1993) 38 NSWLR 257 Cited cited 4×
  20. CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd [1997] HCA 2 Cited cited 792×
  21. Spinnato v Governor of Brixton Prison [2001] EWHC Admin 1124 Cited
  22. Government of Italy v Saia [2001] EWHC Admin 997 Cited
  23. Cabal v United Mexican States [2001] FCA 427 Cited cited 48×
  24. R v Jones [2002] 2 All ER 113 Cited
  25. R v Jones [2002] 2 Cr App R 9 Cited
  26. Hellenic Republic v Tzatzimakis [2002] FCA 340 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.