Pinpoint · Judgment search

Liem v Republic of Indonesia

[2017] FCA 1303

Federal Court of Australia · 10 November 2017 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2018: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2017 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Liem v Republic of Indonesia [2018] FCAFC 135 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 9× · judgment
  2. Rivas v Republic of Chile [2021] FCA 693 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (42)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Thomas A Edison Ltd v Bullock [1912] HCA 72 Cited cited 103×
  2. R v Laverty [1970] 3 All ER 432 Cited
  3. R v Kovacs [1974] 1 WLR 370 Cited
  4. R v Davies [1982] 1 All ER 513 Cited
  5. Hilton v Wells [1985] HCA 16 Cited cited 52×
  6. Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×
  7. R v Clarkson [1987] VR 962 Cited cited 16×
  8. Klepp v Gibb (1988) 81 ALR 383 Cited cited 2×
  9. Carlton and United Breweries (NSW) Pty Ltd v Bond Brewing New South Wales Ltd [1988] FCA 205 Cited cited 30×
  10. Wiest v Director of Public Prosecutions [1988] FCA 450 Cited cited 70×
  11. Corporate Affairs Commission v Papoulias (1989) 20 NSWLR 503 Cited cited 2×
  12. R v Ho (1989) 39 A Crim R 145 Cited cited 16×
  13. Zoeller v Federal Republic of Germany [1989] FCA 802 Cited cited 71×
  14. Harris v Attorney-General (Cth) (1994) 52 FCR 386 Cited cited 75×
  15. Lego Australia Pty Ltd v Paraggio [1994] FCA 1286 Cited cited 37×
  16. Prabowo v Republic of Indonesia (1995) 61 FCR 258 Cited cited 14×
  17. Public Prosecutions (Cth), Director of v Kainhofer [1995] HCA 35 Cited cited 87×
  18. Foster v Attorney-General (Cth) (1997) 97 A Crim R 560 Cited cited 13×
  19. De Bruyn v Republic of South Africa [1999] FCA 1344 Cited cited 29×
  20. Timar v Republic of Hungary [1999] FCA 1518 Cited cited 16×
  21. McDade v United Kingdom [1999] FCA 1868 Cited cited 18×
  22. Cabal v United Mexican States (No 3) [2000] FCA 1204 Cited cited 37×
  23. Rahardja v Republic of Indonesia [2000] FCA 1297 Cited cited 13×
  24. Commonwealth of Australia v Dutton [2000] FCA 1466 Cited cited 13×
  25. Bennett v Government of the United Kingdom [2000] FCA 916 Cited cited 19×
  26. Cabal v United Mexican States [2001] FCA 427 Cited cited 48×
  27. Navarrete v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1723 Cited cited 12×
  28. Von Arnim v Honourable Christopher Martin Ellison [2006] FCAFC 49 Cited cited 6×
  29. Vasiljkovic v Commonwealth of Australia [2006] HCA 40 Cited cited 65×
  30. Tervonen v Minister for Justice and Customs [2007] FCA 1684 Cited cited 21×
  31. Williams v Minister for Justice and Customs of the Commonwealth of Australia [2007] FCAFC 33 Cited cited 20×
  32. O’Donoghue v Ireland [2009] FCAFC 184 Cited cited 9×
  33. Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority [2011] EWHC 2849 Applied or followed
  34. O'Connor v Zentai [2011] FCAFC 102 Applied or followed cited 10×
  35. Marku v Minister for Home Affairs (No 2) [2013] FCA 1015 Cited cited 2×
  36. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 Applied or followed cited 1,516×
  37. Kommatas v Hellenic Republic [2014] FCA 1224 Cited cited 4×
  38. Snedden v Minister for Justice for the Commonwealth of Australia [2014] FCAFC 156 Cited cited 46×
  39. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11 Applied or followed cited 478×
  40. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Eden [2016] FCAFC 28 Cited cited 198×
  41. Nicholls v The Queen [2016] VSCA 300 Cited cited 2×
  42. Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107 Cited cited 330×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.