Pinpoint · Judgment search

Wiest v Director of Public Prosecutions

[1988] FCA 450 ; (1988) 23 FCR 472

Federal Court of Australia · 1988 · Find the judgment

Cited by 70 indexed judgments

All Not followed 1 Distinguished 1 Applied or followed 11 Cited 57

1995: 2 citing judgments 1996: 2 citing judgments 1997: 1 citing judgment 1998: 2 citing judgments 1999: 8 citing judgments 2000: 6 citing judgments 2001: 3 citing judgments 2002: 5 citing judgments, 1 negative 2003: 4 citing judgments, 1 negative 2004: 7 citing judgments 2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 2 citing judgments 2007: 1 citing judgment 2008: 4 citing judgments 2009: 5 citing judgments 2010: 1 citing judgment 2011: 2 citing judgments 2013: 2 citing judgments 2014: 2 citing judgments 2016: 1 citing judgment 2017: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 5 citing judgments 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 1988 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Public Prosecutions (Cth), Director of v Kainhofer [1995] HCA 35 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 87× · judgment
  2. Todhunter, J.A. v United States of America & Anor [1995] FCA 235 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Cook v Commissioner of Police [1996] IRCA 129 Cited IRCA · judgment
  4. Kainhofer, Maria v The Director of Public Prosecutions [1996] FCA 818 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  5. Papazoglou, Alexander v The Republic of the Philippines [1997] FCA 254 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  6. Morales, Monica Del Carmen Lillo v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 334 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 25× · judgment
  7. McDade, Stephen Gerard & Anor v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth [1998] FCA 448 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  8. Republic of South Africa v De Bruyn [1999] FCA 516 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  9. Heath v Hanning [1999] NSWSC 719 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 9× · judgment
  10. Russo v Kogarah Municipal Council [1999] NSWCA 303 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 18× · judgment
  11. McDade v United Kingdom [1999] FCA 1341 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  12. De Bruyn v Republic of South Africa [1999] FCA 1344 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 29× · judgment
  13. Timar v Republic of Hungary [1999] FCA 1518 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 16× · judgment
  14. Xu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1741 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 53× · judgment
  15. McDade v United Kingdom [1999] FCA 1868 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 18× · judgment
  16. Hassell Pty Ltd v Warringah Shire Council [2000] NSWLEC 49 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  17. Timar v The Republic of Hungary [2000] FCA 755 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  18. Cabal v United Mexican States (No 3) [2000] FCA 1204 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 37× · judgment
  19. Rahardja v Republic of Indonesia [2000] FCA 1297 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment
  20. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Ali [2000] FCA 1385 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 29× · judgment
  21. Geographical Indications Committee v Honourable Justice O'Connor [2000] FCA 1877 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 49× · judgment
  22. Cabal v United Mexican States [2001] FCA 427 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 48× · judgment
  23. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 1,750× · judgment
  24. Spargo v Repatriation Commission [2001] FCA 1763 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  25. Tait v Bindal People [2002] FCA 322 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 41× · judgment
  26. Hellenic Republic v Tzatzimakis [2002] FCA 340 Distinguished Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  27. Knauder v Moore [2002] FCA 850 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  28. Dutton v O'Shane [2002] NSWSC 1086 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  29. Knauder v Moore [2002] FCAFC 404 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 11× · judgment
  30. Hellenic Republic v Tzatzimakis [2003] FCAFC 4 Not followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 7× · judgment
  31. Clements v Independent Indigenous Advisory Committee [2003] FCAFC 143 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 139× · judgment
  32. Miller v University of New South Wales [2003] FCAFC 180 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 33× · judgment
  33. Dutton v O'Shane [2003] FCAFC 195 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 24× · judgment
  34. Barry v Owens & Ors [2004] FCA 322 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  35. Duncan v Fayle [2004] FCA 723 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 17× · judgment
  36. Rivera v United States of America [2004] FCAFC 154 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 17× · judgment
  37. United States of America v Griffiths [2004] FCA 879 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  38. New Zealand v Lebler, Moloney & Garchow [2004] NSWLC 9 Cited Local Court of NSW · judgment
  39. Mayhew v United States of America [2004] FCA 1197 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  40. McCrea v Minister for Customs & Justice [2004] FCA 1273 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  41. Duong v Australian Postal Corporation [2005] FCA 991 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  42. Von Arnim v Honourable Christopher Martin Ellison [2006] FCAFC 49 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 6× · judgment
  43. New Zealand v Moloney [2006] FCAFC 143 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 26× · judgment
  44. Mokbel v Attorney-General for the Commonwealth of Australia [2007] FCA 1536 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  45. Parker v State of Western Australia [2008] FCAFC 23 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 7× · judgment
  46. Soh v Commonwealth of Australia [2008] FCA 1524 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment
  47. Hastie Group Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2008] FCAFC 187 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 5× · judgment
  48. 33 South Pty Ltd v Fitzgerald [2008] FCA 1960 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  49. Snedden v Republic of Croatia [2009] FCA 30 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 9× · judgment
  50. O'Donoghue v Ireland [2009] FCA 618 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.