Pinpoint · Judgment search

Frigger v Kitay

[2019] FCA 624

Federal Court of Australia · 6 May 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 10 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 9

2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 2 citing judgments 2021: 3 citing judgments 2022: 4 citing judgments 2019 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Lafferty v Waterton [2019] FCA 2049 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Frigger v Kitay (No 2) [2020] FCA 497 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment
  3. Hardingham v RP Data Pty Limited [2020] FCA 1062 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  4. Frigger, in the matter of Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 4) [2021] FCA 487 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  5. Etnyre v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2021] FCA 610 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  6. Fazal v BKA Practice Co Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 626 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  7. McCardle v Johnson (No 2) [2022] FCA 168 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  8. Quach v MLC Limited [2022] FCA 586 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  9. Frigger v Trenfield (No 6) [2022] FCA 1233 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  10. Frigger v Professional Services of Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1477 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (36)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Cowell v Taylor (1885) 31 Ch D 34 Cited cited 98×
  2. Barton v Minister for Foreign Affairs (1984) 2 FLR 463 Cited cited 3×
  3. Bahr v Nicolay (No 1) [1987] HCA 32 Cited cited 4×
  4. Fernance v Nominal Defendant (1989) 17 NSWLR 710 Cited cited 69×
  5. Equity Access Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation [1989] FCA 361 Applied or followed cited 8×
  6. Impex Pty Ltd v Crowner Products Ltd (1994) 13 ACSR 440 Cited cited 15×
  7. Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Minister for Home Affairs and Environment (1994) 3 FCR 344 Cited cited 4×
  8. Tait v Bindal People [2002] FCA 322 Cited cited 41×
  9. Melville v Craig Nowlan & Associates Pty Ltd & Anor [2002] NSWCA 32 Cited cited 73×
  10. Bray v F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd [2003] FCAFC 153 Cited cited 129×
  11. Iskandar v Merpati Nusantara Airlines [2006] NTCA 3 Cited cited 2×
  12. Tran v The Commonwealth [2009] FCA 921 Cited cited 10×
  13. Ng v Van Der Velde [2010] FCA 89 Cited cited 10×
  14. Delta Electricity v Blue Mountains Conservation Society Inc (security for costs) [2010] NSWCA 264 Cited cited 6×
  15. Charara v Integrex Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 342 Cited cited 10×
  16. SZQGO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 177 Cited cited 7×
  17. Ninan v St George Bank Ltd [2012] FCA 905 Cited cited 21×
  18. Maher v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2013] FCA 1143 Cited cited 3×
  19. Mulhern v Pearce (No 2) [2014] FCA 805 Cited cited 6×
  20. BHP Coal Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2014] FCAFC 138 Cited cited 5×
  21. Vaysman v Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc [2014] FCAFC 60 Cited cited 14×
  22. Mecrus Pty Ltd v Industrial Energy Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 103 Applied or followed cited 32×
  23. Frigger v Clavey Legal Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] WASCA 258 Cited cited 2×
  24. Frigger v Professional Services of Australia Pty Ltd [2015] WASCA 3 Cited cited 2×
  25. AUF15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 115 Cited
  26. Patdith Services Pty Ltd v Mitronics Corporation Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1315 Cited cited 2×
  27. Frigger v Banning [2016] FCA 359 Cited cited 8×
  28. Frigger v Banning (No 2) [2016] FCA 749 Cited cited 3×
  29. Patdith Services Pty Ltd v Mitronics Corporation Pty Ltd [2016] FCCA 1611 Cited cited 3×
  30. Frigger v Kitay (No 9) [2016] WASC 92 Cited cited 2×
  31. Frigger v Kitay [2016] WASCA 173 Cited cited 5×
  32. [2016] WASCA 204 Cited
  33. Frigger v Clavey Legal Pty Ltd [2016] WASCA 67 Cited
  34. Frigger v Kitay [2017] FCA 1278 Applied or followed cited 6×
  35. Kitay, in the matter of Frigger (No 2) [2018] FCA 1032 Cited cited 27×
  36. Frigger, in the matter of Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd (in Liq) (No 2) [2018] FCA 612 Cited cited 8×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.