Pinpoint · Judgment search

Kishore v Tax Practitioners Board

[2016] FCA 1328 ; (2016) 244 FCR 320

Federal Court of Australia · 9 November 2016 · Official judgment

Cited by 9 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 7

2016: 1 citing judgment 2017: 2 citing judgments 2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 2 citing judgments 2020: 2 citing judgments 2021: 1 citing judgment 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Chief of Navy v Angre [2016] FCAFC 171 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 6× · judgment
  2. Frugtniet v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2017] FCA 537 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  3. Commissioner of Patents v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd [2017] FCAFC 129 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 5× · judgment
  4. Hutchison v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2018] FCA 1002 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  5. Alamdo Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 1160 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  6. MDXJ v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2019] FCA 2163 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  7. Transcon Holding Pty Ltd v Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission [2020] FCA 780 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  8. Gadzikwa v Comcare [2020] FCA 1205 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  9. Daly v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2021] FCA 1521 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (13)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Director-General of Social Services v Chaney [1980] FCA 87 Distinguished cited 129×
  2. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×
  3. Geographical Indications Committee v Honourable Justice O'Connor [2000] FCA 1877 Applied or followed cited 49×
  4. Australian Postal Corporation v Forgie [2003] FCAFC 223 Applied or followed cited 16×
  5. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v PTLZ [2008] FCAFC 164 Cited cited 18×
  6. Kowalski v Repatriation Commission [2009] FCAFC 107 Cited cited 18×
  7. Irwin v Military Rehabilitation & Compensation Commission [2009] FCAFC 33 Cited cited 26×
  8. Rana v Repatriation Commission [2011] FCAFC 123 Cited cited 13×
  9. Commissioner of Taxation v Cancer and Bowel Research Association [2013] FCAFC 140 Cited cited 10×
  10. Australian Postal Corporation v Sinnaiah [2013] FCAFC 98 Cited cited 10×
  11. Charltons CJC Pty Ltd v Fitzgerald [2013] NSWSC 350 Cited cited 6×
  12. Lucas v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCA 598 Cited cited 2×
  13. Luck v Chief Executive Officer of Centrelink (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 112 Cited cited 5×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.