Pinpoint · Judgment search

Rutherfurd (Bankrupt) v Inspector-General in Bankruptcy

[2022] FCA 1469

Federal Court of Australia · 11 November 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2023: 1 citing judgment 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Inspector-General in Bankruptcy v Rutherfurd (Bankrupt) [2023] FCAFC 99 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (13)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. RF Brown & Co Limited v TJ Harrison (1927) 137 LT 549 Cited cited 3×
  2. Shell Co of Australia Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1930] UKPCHCA 1 Cited cited 44×
  3. Collector of Customs (NSW) v Brian Lawlor Automotive Pty Ltd (1979) 2 ALD 1 Cited cited 32×
  4. Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1979] AATA 179 Cited cited 660×
  5. Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1979] FCA 39 Cited cited 491×
  6. Re Gee v Director-General of Social Services [1981] AATA 21 Cited cited 3×
  7. Director-General of Social Services v Chaney (1989) 47 FLR 80 Cited
  8. Victims Compensation Fund Corporation v Brown (2003) 77 ALR 1797 Cited
  9. Shi v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2008] HCA 31 Cited cited 405×
  10. Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd [2012] HCA 55 Cited cited 470×
  11. Thiess v Collector of Customs [2014] HCA 12 Cited cited 154×
  12. MDXJ v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2019] FCA 2163 Cited cited 8×
  13. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Makasa [2021] HCA 1 Cited cited 56×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.