Pinpoint · Judgment search

Gadzikwa v Comcare

[2020] FCA 1560

Federal Court of Australia · 28 October 2020 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2021: 1 citing judgment 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Gadzikwa v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2021] FCA 151 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (31)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. In re Will of FB Gilbert (dec) [1946] NSWStRp 24 Cited cited 347×
  3. Director-General of Social Services v Chaney [1980] FCA 2163 Cited
  4. Director-General of Social Services v Chaney [1980] FCA 87 Cited cited 129×
  5. Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc [1981] HCA 39 Cited cited 623×
  6. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×
  7. Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 621 Cited
  8. Cosco Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Taxation & Anor [1997] FCA 1504 Cited cited 80×
  9. Australian Postal Commission v Hayes (1998) 23 FCR 320 Cited
  10. Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11 Cited cited 2,226×
  11. Geographical Indications Committee v Honourable Justice O'Connor [2000] FCA 1877 Cited cited 49×
  12. Duncan v Hotop [2002] FMCA 37 Cited
  13. Telstra Corporation Limited v Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy [2008] FCAFC 7 Cited cited 49×
  14. SZAJB v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCAFC 75 Cited cited 42×
  15. Kowalski v Repatriation Commission [2009] FCAFC 107 Cited cited 18×
  16. Yao v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2010] FCA 18 Cited cited 17×
  17. Yao v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2010] FCA 241 Cited cited 4×
  18. Cabcharge Australia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2010] FCAFC 111 Cited cited 48×
  19. Rawson Finances Pty Limited v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCAFC 139 Cited cited 89×
  20. Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2010] HCA 21 Cited cited 331×
  21. Phillips v Inspector-General in Bankruptcy [2011] FCA 612 Cited cited 5×
  22. Wong v Sklavos (2014) 225 FCR 405 Cited
  23. Mladenov v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2015] FCA 1472 Cited cited 3×
  24. Commissioner of Police, New South Wales v Guo [2016] FCAFC 62 Cited cited 6×
  25. Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2016] FCAFC 97 Cited cited 35×
  26. Douglass v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2017] FCA 1105 Cited cited 4×
  27. Ellis v Scentre Shopping Centre Management (WA) Pty Ltd trading as Westfield Shoppingtown Carousel Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 336 Cited
  28. MDXJ v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2019] FCA 2163 Cited cited 8×
  29. Ah-Chee v Stuart [2019] FCAFC 165 Cited cited 9×
  30. [2020] AATA 631 Cited
  31. Gadzikwa v Comcare [2020] FCA 1205 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.