Pinpoint · Judgment search

Frugtniet v Australian Securities and Investments Commission

[2023] FCAFC 14

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · 17 February 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (40)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v War Pensions Entitlement Appeal Tribunal; ex parte Bott [1933] HCA 30 Cited cited 252×
  2. Myers v Director of Public Prosecutions [1964] 2 All ER 8 Cited
  3. [1964] 3 WLR 145 Cited cited 3×
  4. R v Deputy Industrial Injuries Commissioner; Ex parte Moore [1965] 1 All ER 81 Cited
  5. R v Deputy Industrial Injuries Commissioner; Ex parte Moore [1965] 1 QB 456 Cited cited 36×
  6. T.A. Miller v Minister for Housing [1968] 1 WLR 992 Cited cited 12×
  7. T.A. Miller v Minister for Housing [1968] 2 All ER 633 Cited cited 3×
  8. Kavanagh v Chief Costable of Devon and Cornwall [1974] 2 All ER 697 Cited
  9. Kavanagh v Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall [1974] QB 624 Cited cited 4×
  10. Re Pochi and Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1979] AATA 64 Cited cited 151×
  11. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Pochi [1980] FCA 85 Cited cited 219×
  12. Barbaro v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1982) 44 ALR 690 Cited cited 6×
  13. Barbaro v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1982) 65 FLR 127 Cited cited 4×
  14. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×
  15. Webb v The Queen [1994] HCA 30 Cited cited 387×
  16. Attorney-General (Q) v Australian Industrial Relations Commission [2002] HCA 42 Cited cited 37×
  17. (2004) 84 ALD 774 Cited cited 2×
  18. Applicant VEAL of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 72 Cited cited 257×
  19. Chang v Laidley Shire Council [2007] HCA 37 Cited cited 22×
  20. Wecker v Secretary, Department of Education Science and Training [2008] FCAFC 108 Cited cited 16×
  21. Shi v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2008] HCA 31 Applied or followed cited 405×
  22. Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 23 Cited cited 283×
  23. Law Institute of Victoria Limited v Frugtniet (Legal Practice) [2011] VCAT 596 Cited cited 5×
  24. Rawson Finances Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCAFC 26 Cited cited 61×
  25. Danagher v Child Support Registrar [2014] FCA 1408 Cited cited 6×
  26. Sullivan v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2014] FCAFC 93 Cited cited 174×
  27. Ralph v Repatriation Commission [2015] FCA 165 Cited cited 3×
  28. Frugtniet v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2016] AATA 229 Cited
  29. Frugtniet v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2016] AATA 299 Cited cited 4×
  30. Frugtniet v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2016] FCA 995 Cited cited 7×
  31. Frugtniet v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2017] FCA 537 Cited cited 6×
  32. SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34 Cited cited 583×
  33. Applicant v The Regulator [2019] AATA 4683 Cited
  34. Frugtniet v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2019] HCA 16 Cited cited 72×
  35. CNY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 50 Cited cited 146×
  36. Schroeder v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2020] AATA 2453 Cited
  37. Minister for Home Affairs v Brown [2020] FCAFC 21 Cited cited 23×
  38. MBJY v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 11 Cited cited 30×
  39. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Makasa [2021] HCA 1 Cited cited 56×
  40. [2022] AATA 295 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.