Pinpoint · Judgment search

SG v New South Wales Crime Commission (No 4)

[2021] NSWSC 92

Supreme Court of NSW · 4 February 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. SG v New South Wales Crime Commission (No 6) [2022] NSWSC 779 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  2. SG v New South Wales Crime Commission (No 8) [2023] NSWSC 811 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (10)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Commissioner for Railways v Small [1938] NSWStRp 29 Cited cited 227×
  2. National Employers' Mutual General Association Ltd v Waind and Hill [1978] 1 NSWLR 372 Cited cited 223×
  3. Wran v Australian Broadcasting Commission [1984] 3 NSWLR 241 Cited cited 11×
  4. Taylor v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [1999] 2 AC 177 Cited cited 14×
  5. Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36 Cited cited 375×
  6. X7 v Australian Crime Commission [2013] HCA 29 Cited cited 157×
  7. A v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2014] NSWCA 414 Cited cited 12×
  8. SG v New South Wales Crime Commission [2016] NSWSC 1615 Cited cited 6×
  9. Ulman v Live Group Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 338 Cited cited 7×
  10. SG v New South Wales Crime Commission (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 600 Cited cited 3×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.