Federal Court of Australia · 19 September 1997 · Official judgment
Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited
[2002] FCAFC 257
Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · judgment
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[1978] HCA 43 Cited cited 323×[1983] HCA 17 Cited cited 424×[1984] HCA 85 Cited cited 311×[1985] HCA 81 Cited cited 1,205×[1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×[1986] HCA 39 Cited cited 487×[1989] HCA 46 Cited cited 476×[1990] HCA 31 Applied or followed cited 260×[1992] HCA 34 Cited cited 601×[1993] HCA 77 Cited cited 679×[1994] HCA 42 Cited cited 398×[1994] HCA 30 Applied or followed cited 387×Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.
Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
(1885) 10 App Cas 210
Cited cited 33× (1889) 14 App Cas 665
Cited cited 149× [1935] HCA 48
Cited cited 151× [1957] HCA 68
Cited cited 4× [1970] 2 QB 417
Cited cited 10× [1970] EWCA Civ 7
Cited cited 3× [1971] 2 QB 662
Cited cited 4× [1976] HCA 39
Cited cited 255× [1978] HCA 43
Cited cited 323× [1979] 1 WLR 723
Cited cited 8× [1979] UKHL 4
Cited cited 32× [1980] QB 283
Cited cited 3× [1981] UKHL 13
Cited cited 195× (1983) 62 ALR 284
Applied or followed cited 5× [1983] 2 AC 394
Cited cited 58× [1983] HCA 17
Cited cited 424× (1984) 1 FCR 341
Applied or followed cited 3× [1984] HCA 85
Cited cited 311× [1985] HCA 81
Cited cited 1,205× (1986) 10 FCR 78
Cited cited 20× [1986] HCA 39
Cited cited 487× [1986] HCA 40
Cited cited 2,191× [1988] FCA 76
Cited cited 55× (1989) 18 ALD 77
Cited cited 14× [1989] FCA 273
Cited cited 11× [1989] FCA 518
Cited cited 156× [1989] HCA 46
Cited cited 476× (1990) 47 A Crim R 111
Cited cited 8× (1990) 92 ALR 93
Cited cited 24× [1990] FCA 19
Distinguished cited 139× [1990] HCA 31
Applied or followed cited 260× (1991) 27 ALD 668
Cited cited 2× (1991) 29 ALD 469
Cited cited 2× (1991) 31 FCR 123
Cited cited 9× (1991) 31 FCR 565
Distinguished cited 3× (1991) 33 FCR 87
Cited cited 38× [1991] FCA 501
Cited cited 69× [1991] FCA 92
Cited cited 41× (1992) 29 ALD 182
Cited cited 3× [1992] HCA 34
Cited cited 601× (1993) 45 FCR 540
Cited cited 16× [1993] HCA 77
Cited cited 679× (1994) 35 ALD 225
Cited cited 36× (1994) 55 FCR 375
Cited cited 19× (1994) 55 FLR 221
Cited [1994] HCA 30
Applied or followed cited 387× [1994] HCA 42
Cited cited 398× [1994] HCA 66
Applied or followed cited 28× (1995) 38 ALD 529
Cited cited 2× (1995) 39 ALD 328
Cited cited 3× [1995] FCA 1561
Cited cited 15× [1997] 1 VR 332
Cited cited 30× Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.