Pinpoint · Judgment search

Katsuno v The Queen

[1999] HCA 50 ; (1999) 199 CLR 40 ; (1999) 166 ALR 159

High Court of Australia · 1999 · Official judgment

Cited by 30 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 5 Cited 25

1999: 1 citing judgment 2000: 3 citing judgments 2001: 2 citing judgments 2004: 3 citing judgments 2005: 1 citing judgment 2007: 4 citing judgments 2009: 1 citing judgment 2010: 2 citing judgments 2012: 1 citing judgment 2018: 2 citing judgments 2021: 2 citing judgments 2022: 2 citing judgments 2023: 4 citing judgments 2025: 2 citing judgments 1999 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Wu v The Queen [1999] HCA 52 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 66× · judgment
  2. Barwick v Law Society of New South Wales [2000] HCA 2 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 36× · judgment
  3. Eastman v The Queen [2000] HCA 29 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 161× · judgment
  4. Cheng v The Queen [2000] HCA 53 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 32× · judgment
  5. Brownlee v The Queen [2001] HCA 36 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 35× · judgment
  6. Cheung v The Queen [2001] HCA 67 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 222× · judgment
  7. Regina v Ronen & Ors [2004] NSWSC 1294 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  8. Regina (Cth) v Ronen; Regina (Cth) v Ronen; Regina (Cth) v Ronen [2004] NSWCCA 176 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  9. R v Brown & Tran [2004] NSWCCA 324 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 14× · judgment
  10. Australian Federal Police v Carson [2005] FCA 101 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  11. PETROULIAS v R [2007] NSWCCA 134 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 16× · judgment
  12. KAMM, William v. Regina [2007] NSWCCA 201 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  13. CESAN v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (CTH); MAS RIVADAVIA v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (CTH) [2007] NSWCCA 273 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 12× · judgment
  14. Roach v Electoral Commissioner [2007] HCA 43 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 32× · judgment
  15. Apache Northwest Pty Ltd (ABN 58 009 140 854) v Agostini [2009] FCA 534 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  16. In the matter of Trio Capital Ltd (admins apptd) [2010] NSWSC 454 Applied or followed Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  17. Smith v R [2010] NSWCCA 325 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 9× · judgment
  18. JAMAL v R [2012] NSWCCA 198 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 10× · judgment
  19. Hoang v R [2018] NSWCCA 166 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  20. Attorney General for New South Wales v XX [2018] NSWCCA 198 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  21. LibertyWorks Inc v Commonwealth of Australia [2021] HCA 18 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 22× · judgment
  22. Hofer v The Queen [2021] HCA 36 Applied or followed High Court of Australia · cited 75× · judgment
  23. Hoang v The Queen [2022] HCA 14 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  24. Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 26 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 192× · judgment
  25. Fantakis v R [2023] NSWCCA 3 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 10× · judgment
  26. Dedeoglu v R [2023] NSWCCA 126 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  27. Sun v R [2023] NSWCCA 147 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  28. Jones v Commonwealth of Australia [2023] HCA 34 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment
  29. Brawn v The King [2025] HCA 20 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  30. MDP v The King [2025] HCA 24 Cited High Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (62)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Marbury v Madison (1803) 5 US 87 Cited cited 4×
  2. R v Short (1898) 15 WN (NSW) 140 Cited cited 3×
  3. (1898) 19 LR (NSW) L 385 Cited
  4. R v Snow [1915] HCA 90 Cited cited 36×
  5. Crane v Director of Public Prosecutions [1921] 2 AC 299 Cited cited 15×
  6. Re Judiciary and Navigation Acts [1921] HCA 20 Cited cited 243×
  7. R v Screen and McCarthy (1924) 41 WN (NSW) 20 Cited
  8. R v Dempster [1924] SASR 299 Cited cited 7×
  9. Mechanical and General Inventions Co Ltd v Austin [1935] AC 346 Cited cited 14×
  10. R v Federal Court of Bankruptcy; Ex parte Lowenstein [1938] HCA 10 Cited cited 32×
  11. Railroad Commission of Texas v Pullman Co (1941) 312 US 496 Cited
  12. R v Ashton (1944) 61 WN (NSW) 134 Cited
  13. Hocking v Bell [1945] HCA 16 Cited cited 89×
  14. R v Neal [1949] 2 KB 590 Cited cited 2×
  15. R v Furlong [1950] 1 All ER 636 Cited
  16. R v Smith [1954] QWN 49 Cited cited 5×
  17. R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia [1956] HCA 10 Cited cited 172×
  18. Attorney-General (Cth) v The Queen (1957) 95 CLR 529 Cited cited 46×
  19. Attorney-General (Cth) v The Queen [1957] UKPCHCA 1 Cited cited 31×
  20. R v Reynhoudt [1962] HCA 23 Cited cited 42×
  21. [1964] 2 QB 322 Cited
  22. Spratt v Hermes [1965] HCA 66 Cited cited 36×
  23. Ward v James [1966] 1 QB 273 Cited cited 8×
  24. R v McGill [1967] VR 683 Cited cited 2×
  25. Duncan v Louisiana (1968) 391 US 145 Cited cited 2×
  26. R v Robinson (1969) 53 Cr App R 314 Cited cited 2×
  27. Peel v The Queen [1971] HCA 59 Cited cited 32×
  28. R v Hall [1971] VR 293 Cited cited 6×
  29. R v Carlstrom [1977] VR 366 Cited
  30. Johns v The Queen [1979] HCA 33 Cited cited 7×
  31. R v Sheffield Crown Court; Ex parte Brownlow [1980] QB 530 Cited cited 3×
  32. R v Mason [1981] QB 881 Cited
  33. Commonwealth v Tasmania [1983] HCA 21 Cited cited 183×
  34. Patton v Yount (1984) 467 US 1025 Cited
  35. Wainwright v Witt (1985) 469 US 412 Cited
  36. Kingswell v The Queen [1985] HCA 72 Cited cited 62×
  37. Lockhart v McCree (1986) 476 US 162 Cited
  38. Brown v The Queen [1986] HCA 11 Cited cited 46×
  39. Flaherty v Girgis [1987] HCA 17 Cited cited 45×
  40. Maher v The Queen [1987] HCA 31 Cited cited 27×
  41. Wilde v The Queen [1988] HCA 6 Cited cited 157×
  42. [1988] VR 937 Cited
  43. Jago v District Court (NSW) [1989] HCA 46 Cited cited 476×
  44. R v Robinson [1989] VR 289 Cited
  45. Marcel v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [1992] Ch 225 Cited cited 14×
  46. [1992] Ch 241 Cited
  47. R v Glennon [1992] HCA 16 Cited cited 180×
  48. Morris v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [1993] Ch 372 Cited cited 7×
  49. Holland v The Queen [1993] HCA 43 Cited cited 16×
  50. Cheatle v The Queen [1993] HCA 44 Cited cited 66×
  51. Johns v Australian Securities Commission [1993] HCA 56 Cited cited 180×
  52. R v Mentink [1996] 1 Qd R 532 Cited cited 2×
  53. Taikato v The Queen [1996] HCA 28 Cited cited 59×
  54. Zickar v MGH Plastic Industries Pty Ltd [1996] HCA 31 Cited cited 83×
  55. MacKenzie v The Queen [1996] HCA 35 Cited cited 246×
  56. R v Su [1997] 1 VR 1 Cited cited 5×
  57. Green v The Queen [1997] HCA 50 Cited cited 28×
  58. KBT v The Queen [1997] HCA 54 Cited cited 53×
  59. R v Katsuno [1998] 4 VR 414 Cited
  60. Gould v Brown [1998] HCA 6 Cited cited 90×
  61. Melbourne v The Queen [1999] HCA 32 Cited cited 113×
  62. Wu v The Queen [1999] HCA 52 Cited cited 66×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.