Pinpoint · Judgment search

Saunders v R

[2022] NSWCCA 273

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 15 December 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 16 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 15

2023: 12 citing judgments 2024: 4 citing judgments 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Bhatia v R [2023] NSWCCA 12 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 7× · judgment
  2. Cliff v R [2023] NSWCCA 15 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  3. BQ v R [2023] NSWCCA 34 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  4. Park v R [2023] NSWCCA 71 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  5. Barney v R [2023] NSWCCA 85 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  6. McCosker v R [2023] NSWCCA 131 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  7. DS v R [2023] NSWCCA 151 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  8. BW v R [2023] NSWCCA 146 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  9. JPM v R [2023] NSWCCA 220 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  10. Pandamooz v R [2023] NSWCCA 221 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  11. Ilievski v R; Nolan v R (No 2) [2023] NSWCCA 248 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  12. Marco v R [2023] NSWCCA 307 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  13. RN v R [2024] NSWCCA 20 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  14. LH v R [2024] NSWCCA 165 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  15. Omigie v R [2024] NSWCCA 205 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  16. Profilio v R [2024] NSWCCA 219 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (26)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63 Cited cited 970×
  2. MacKenzie v The Queen [1996] HCA 35 Cited cited 246×
  3. Jones v The Queen [1997] HCA 56 Doubted cited 311×
  4. REGINA v MARKULESKI [2001] NSWCCA 290 Overruled or disapproved cited 264×
  5. MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53 Overruled or disapproved cited 513×
  6. Weiss v The Queen [2005] HCA 81 Cited cited 253×
  7. NORRIS v REGINA [2007] NSWCCA 235 Applied or followed cited 9×
  8. TK v R [2009] NSWCCA 151 Applied or followed cited 117×
  9. R v Ford [2009] NSWCCA 306 Cited cited 88×
  10. FALLAH v THE QUEEN [2010] NSWCCA 212 Not followed
  11. Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37 Cited cited 712×
  12. IMM v The Queen [2016] HCA 14 Cited cited 250×
  13. Queen v Baden-Clay [2016] HCA 35 Cited cited 340×
  14. Hughes v The Queen [2017] HCA 20 Cited cited 168×
  15. Queen v Bauer [2018] HCA 40 Cited cited 165×
  16. McPhillamy v The Queen [2018] HCA 52 Cited cited 62×
  17. Ganiji v R [2019] NSWCCA 208 Cited cited 15×
  18. Pell v The Queen [2020] HCA 12 Cited cited 198×
  19. Collins v R [2020] NSWCCA 198 Applied or followed cited 8×
  20. Taylor v R [2020] NSWCCA 355 Cited cited 20×
  21. Hofer v The Queen [2021] HCA 36 Cited cited 75×
  22. Dadley v R [2021] NSWCCA 267 Applied or followed cited 5×
  23. Zhou v R [2021] NSWCCA 278 Cited cited 27×
  24. Dansie v The Queen [2022] HCA 25 Cited cited 97×
  25. Tomlinson v R [2022] NSWCCA 16 Cited cited 17×
  26. AK v R [2022] NSWCCA 175 Cited cited 16×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.