Supreme Court of NSW · 18 May 1999 · Official judgment
Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited
[2006] NSWDC 113
Cited District Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[1948] HCA 1 Cited cited 48×[1964] HCA 69 Cited cited 2,085×[1966] HCA 40 Cited cited 212×(1979) 30 ALR 181 Cited cited 50×(1982) 44 ALR 365 Cited cited 39×[1986] 1 All ER 54 Cited cited 8×[1988] FCA 462 Cited cited 29×[1993] HCA 57 Cited cited 391×[1995] HCA 17 Cited cited 139×(1997) 42 NSWLR 550 Cited cited 11×[1998] HCA 5 Cited cited 169×[1947] EWCA Civ 1 Cited cited 715×[1980] HCA 12 Applied or followed cited 655×[1986] HCA 1 Cited cited 342×[1988] HCA 15 Cited cited 359×[1991] HCA 12 Cited cited 721×[1997] HCA 25 Cited cited 344×[1931] HCA 34 Cited cited 185×[1956] HCA 10 Cited cited 172×[1983] HCA 39 Cited cited 243×[1995] HCA 65 Cited cited 212×[1998] NSWSC 32 Cited cited 15×Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.
Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
[1948] HCA 1
Cited cited 48× [1964] HCA 69
Cited cited 2,085× (1965) 65 SR (NSW) 185
Cited cited 2× (1966-67) 116 CLR 397
Cited cited 5× [1966] HCA 40
Cited cited 212× (1979) 30 ALR 181
Cited cited 50× (1982) 44 ALR 365
Cited cited 39× [1986] 1 All ER 54
Cited cited 8× [1988] FCA 462
Cited cited 29× (1991-92) 26 NSWLR 9
Cited cited 7× [1993] HCA 57
Cited cited 391× [1995] HCA 17
Cited cited 139× (1996-97) 188 CLR 159
Cited (1997) 42 NSWLR 550
Cited cited 11× [1998] HCA 5
Cited cited 169× [1998] NSWSC 32
Cited cited 15× Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.