Pinpoint · Judgment search

The Queen v Tran

[2000] FCA 1888 ; (2000) 105 FCR 182

Federal Court of Australia · 22 December 2000 · Official judgment

Cited by 11 indexed judgments

All Cited 11

2001: 2 citing judgments 2002: 1 citing judgment 2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 1 citing judgment 2007: 1 citing judgment 2008: 1 citing judgment 2012: 1 citing judgment 2018: 2 citing judgments 2023: 1 citing judgment 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Massey v The Queen [2001] FCA 1558 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. JST v Queen [2001] FCA 1673 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Salasch v The Queen [2002] FCAFC 119 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · judgment
  4. Inspector Ross Wolf v Rockdale Beef Pty Limited [2005] NSWIRComm 169 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 6× · judgment
  5. Robinson v R [2006] NSWCCA 192 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 38× · judgment
  6. SMALE, Garry Anthony v R [2007] NSWCCA 328 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 15× · judgment
  7. SIEDERS, Johan v R; SOMSRI, Yotchomchin v R [2008] NSWCCA 187 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 11× · judgment
  8. Wood v R [2012] NSWCCA 21 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 79× · judgment
  9. Orr v Hunter Quarries Pty Ltd (No. 4) [2018] NSWDC 538 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  10. Sahartor v R [2018] NSWCCA 236 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  11. Fantakis v R [2023] NSWCCA 3 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 10× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (46)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Banks [1916] 2 KB 621 Cited cited 4×
  2. Hargan v The King [1919] HCA 45 Cited cited 16×
  3. (1935) 25 Cr. App. R. 109 Cited
  4. Davies and Cody v The King [1937] HCA 27 Cited cited 51×
  5. R v Wilkes [1948] HCA 22 Cited cited 28×
  6. Raspor v The Queen [1958] HCA 30 Cited cited 11×
  7. R v Cooper (1969) 53 C App R 83 Cited
  8. Stafford v DPP [1974] AC 878 Cited cited 2×
  9. Richardson v The Queen [1974] HCA 19 Cited cited 51×
  10. Ratten v The Queen [1974] HCA 35 Cited cited 163×
  11. Duff v R (1980) 26 ALR 663 Cited
  12. Reid v The Queen [1980] AC 343 Cited cited 11×
  13. R v McCullough (1982) 6 A Crim R 274 Cited cited 26×
  14. Whitehorn v The Queen [1983] HCA 42 Cited cited 167×
  15. R v Apostilides [1984] HCA 38 Cited cited 114×
  16. Director of Public Prosecutions (Nauru) v Fowler [1984] HCA 48 Cited cited 53×
  17. Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) [1984] HCA 7 Applied or followed cited 215×
  18. R v Bazley (1986) 21 A Crim R 19 Cited
  19. King v The Queen [1986] HCA 59 Cited cited 71×
  20. R v Komornick [1986] VR 845 Cited
  21. Zecevic v Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) [1987] HCA 26 Cited cited 75×
  22. Morris v The Queen [1987] HCA 50 Cited cited 128×
  23. (1988) 35 A Crim R 387 Cited cited 2×
  24. Carr v The Queen [1988] HCA 47 Cited cited 32×
  25. Sams v R (1990) 46 A Crim R 468 Cited cited 2×
  26. Shepherd v The Queen [1990] HCA 56 Cited cited 315×
  27. Clarkson v DPP [1990] VR 745 Cited cited 6×
  28. R v Anderson (1991) 53 A Crim R 421 Applied or followed cited 28×
  29. R v Pernich (1991) 55 A Crim R 464 Cited cited 2×
  30. In R v M [1991] 2 Qd R 69 Cited
  31. Chidiac v The Queen [1991] HCA 4 Cited cited 57×
  32. R v Maguire (1992) 94 Cr App R 133 Cited
  33. Knight v The Queen [1992] HCA 56 Cited cited 85×
  34. M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63 Cited cited 970×
  35. R v Bartlett [1996] 2 VR 687 Cited cited 2×
  36. R v Tangye (1997) 92 A Crim R 545 Cited cited 77×
  37. R v R (1997) 99 A Crim R 327 Cited cited 3×
  38. Parker v The Queen [1997] HCA 15 Cited cited 32×
  39. Jones v The Queen [1997] HCA 56 Cited cited 311×
  40. R v Armstrong [1998] 4 VR 533 Cited cited 3×
  41. Gipp v The Queen [1998] HCA 21 Cited cited 143×
  42. Fleming v The Queen [1998] HCA 68 Applied or followed cited 328×
  43. R v Serratore [1999] NSWCCA 377 Cited cited 65×
  44. Regina v GIAM [1999] NSWCCA 53 Cited cited 37×
  45. R v NRC [1999] VSCA 184 Cited cited 3×
  46. R v Carr [2000] 2 Cr App R 149 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.