Pinpoint · Judgment search

Regina v Karacic

[2001] NSWCCA 12 ; (2001) 121 A Crim R 7

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 2 February 2001 · Official judgment

Cited by 14 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 12

2001: 2 citing judgments 2002: 1 citing judgment 2003: 1 citing judgment 2004: 3 citing judgments 2006: 1 citing judgment 2008: 3 citing judgments 2011: 1 citing judgment 2015: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2001 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Chua [2001] NSWCCA 50 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Regina v Chanthaboury [2001] NSWCCA 74 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  3. REGINA v WHYTE [2002] NSWCCA 343 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 336× · judgment
  4. R v NTSELE [2003] NSWCCA 111 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  5. Regina v Mas Rivadavia; Regina v El Akkaoui; Regina v Aksu [2004] NSWCCA 284 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 33× · judgment
  6. R v Anderson [2004] NSWCCA 317 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  7. R v A [2004] NSWCCA 292 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 24× · judgment
  8. Byres v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 82 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 28× · judgment
  9. R v SC [2008] NSWCCA 29 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 16× · judgment
  10. R v CHEA, Chhengly [2008] NSWCCA 78 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  11. Milich v Regina [2008] NSWCCA 148 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  12. Inspector Colin Fraser v Natoli [2011] NSWIRComm 77 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · judgment
  13. Alpha v R [2015] NSWCCA 225 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 9× · judgment
  14. You, Jae Bok v R [2020] NSWCCA 71 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 12× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (6)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Jurisic (1998) 48 NSWLR 209 Cited cited 2×
  2. R v Wong and Leung [1999] 48 NSWLR 340 Cited cited 7×
  3. R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54 Cited cited 1,119×
  4. REGINA v HENRY BARBER TRAN SILVER TSOUKATOS KYROGLOU JENKINS [1999] NSWCCA 111 Cited cited 1,285×
  5. R v Ngui and Tiong [2000] 111 A Crim R 593 Cited
  6. R v THOMSON; R v HOULTON [2000] NSWCCA 309 Cited cited 2,216×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.