Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Bolt

[2001] NSWCCA 487 ; (2001) 126 A Crim R 284

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 13 December 2001 · Official judgment

Cited by 15 indexed judgments

All Cited 15

2003: 1 citing judgment 2005: 1 citing judgment 2007: 2 citing judgments 2009: 1 citing judgment 2010: 2 citing judgments 2011: 1 citing judgment 2012: 4 citing judgments 2014: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2001 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Yu [2003] NSWSC 1153 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Regina v Mohamad Ali [2005] NSWSC 334 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 17× · judgment
  3. Tekely v R; Nagle v R [2007] NSWCCA 75 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 47× · judgment
  4. R v KING [2007] NSWSC 1134 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  5. R v Jeffrey; R v Mealey [2009] NSWSC 202 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  6. R v Horton [2010] NSWSC 1007 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  7. R v BELLCHAMBERS [2010] NSWDC 306 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  8. R v Forbes [2011] NSWSC 1547 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  9. R v Vulovic (No. 4) [2012] NSWSC 212 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  10. R v Andrew Iskandar & R v Nita Iskandar (No. 4) [2012] NSWSC 149 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  11. R v Won [2012] NSWSC 855 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  12. R v Hazairin Iskandar [2012] NSWSC 1324 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  13. R v Panetta [2014] NSWSC 27 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  14. R v Cliff (No 6) [2018] NSWSC 587 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  15. Fuller v R [2022] NSWCCA 203 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 12× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (25)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Withers (1925) 25 SR 382 Cited
  2. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  3. Cranssen v The King [1936] HCA 42 Cited cited 32×
  4. R v Geddes [1936] NSWStRp 35 Cited cited 89×
  5. R v Williscroft [1975] VR 292 Cited cited 32×
  6. Griffiths v The Queen [1977] HCA 44 Cited cited 233×
  7. R v Hill (1980) 3 A Crim R 397 Cited cited 11×
  8. (1980) 3 A. Crim. R. 397 Cited cited 2×
  9. R v Holder (1983) 3 NSWLR 245 Cited cited 181×
  10. R v Hayes (1987) 29 A Crim R 452 Cited cited 18×
  11. Bugmy v The Queen (1990) 47 A Cim R 433 Cited
  12. R v Warfield (1994) 34 NSWLR 200 Cited cited 15×
  13. R v Allpass (1994) 72 A Crim R 561 Cited cited 26×
  14. R v Alexander (1994) 78 A Crim R 141 Cited cited 32×
  15. (1994) 78 A. Crim. R. 141 Cited cited 2×
  16. Everett v The Queen [1994] HCA 49 Cited cited 214×
  17. Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (1995) 36 NSWLR 374 Cited cited 13×
  18. R v Jurisic [1998] NSWSC 423 Cited cited 273×
  19. REGINA v. WEBSTER [1999] NSWCCA 313 Cited cited 5×
  20. REGINA v MORROW [1999] NSWCCA 64 Cited cited 7×
  21. Regina v Leslie Kalache [2000] NSWCCA 2 Cited cited 108×
  22. REGINA v. PONT [2000] NSWCCA 419 Cited cited 33×
  23. R v HOUGHTON [2000] NSWCCA 62 Cited cited 12×
  24. Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64 Cited cited 1,044×
  25. REGINA v. DUNCOMBE [2001] NSWCCA 483 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.