Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v KT

[2007] NSWSC 83

Supreme Court of NSW · 16 February 2007 · Official judgment

Cited by 10 indexed judgments

All Cited 10

2007: 2 citing judgments 2008: 2 citing judgments 2009: 2 citing judgments 2010: 1 citing judgment 2014: 2 citing judgments 2015: 1 citing judgment 2007 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v SG [2007] NSWSC 511 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  2. R v CK; R v TCS [2007] NSWSC 1424 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  3. KT v R [2008] NSWCCA 51 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 293× · judgment
  4. ID, PF and DV v Director General, Department of Juvenile Justice and Anor [2008] NSWSC 966 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 10× · judgment
  5. REGINA v DGP; REGINA v PB [2009] NSWSC 1154 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  6. REGINA v CW [2009] NSWSC 1155 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  7. Donaczy v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 143 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  8. R v JP [2014] NSWSC 698 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  9. R v JH [2014] NSWSC 1878 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  10. R v Lambaditis [2015] NSWSC 746 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (27)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Hill (1981) 3 A Crim R 397 Cited cited 121×
  2. R v Brougham (1986) 43 SASR 187 Cited cited 9×
  3. In R v Pham & Ly (1991) 55 A Crim R 128 Cited cited 119×
  4. Wilson v The Queen [1992] HCA 31 Cited cited 92×
  5. Hawkins v R (1993) 67 A Crim R 64 Cited cited 14×
  6. R v Gordon (1994) 71 A Crim R 459 Cited cited 75×
  7. Maxwell v The Queen (1995-1996) 184 CLR 501 Cited cited 12×
  8. R v Previtera (1997) 94 A Crim R 76 Cited cited 318×
  9. REGINA v TRAN [1999] NSWCCA 109 Cited cited 102×
  10. REGINA v LEONI [1999] NSWCCA 14 Cited cited 8×
  11. R v THOMSON; R v HOULTON [2000] NSWCCA 309 Cited cited 2,216×
  12. R v Button R v Griffen [2002] NSWCCA 159 Cited cited 45×
  13. R v D.S.W [2003] NSWCCA 322 Cited cited 2×
  14. R v Hoang [2003] NSWCCA 380 Cited cited 38×
  15. Regina v Villar; Regina v Zugecic [2004] NSWCCA 302 Cited cited 7×
  16. Regina v V D N [2004] NSWSC 426 Cited cited 6×
  17. R v Lavender [2005] HCA 37 Cited cited 106×
  18. R v MD, BM, NA, JT [2005] NSWCCA 342 Cited cited 57×
  19. REGINA v Warren Alan FORBES [2005] NSWCCA 377 Cited cited 124×
  20. Regina v Mohamad Ali [2005] NSWSC 334 Cited cited 17×
  21. D A C v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 265 Cited cited 10×
  22. Regina v F.D; Regina v F.D; Regina v J.D [2006] NSWCCA 31 Cited cited 29×
  23. R v M.A.K., R v M.S.K. [2006] NSWCCA 381 Cited cited 369×
  24. Regina v Stambolis [2006] NSWCCA 56 Cited cited 71×
  25. Regina v M.B. [2006] NSWSC 1164 Cited cited 6×
  26. Fahs v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 26 Cited cited 48×
  27. KT v R [2008] NSWCCA 51 Cited cited 293×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.