Pinpoint · Judgment search

CW v Regina

[2011] NSWCCA 45

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 22 March 2011 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2011: 1 citing judgment 2011 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. HAMED v REGINA [2011] NSWCCA 219 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (16)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Alexander (1994) 78 A Crim R 141 Cited cited 32×
  2. M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63 Cited cited 970×
  3. R v GREEN [1999] NSWCCA 97 Cited cited 22×
  4. REGINA v SIMPSON [2001] NSWCCA 534 Cited cited 682×
  5. MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53 Cited cited 513×
  6. R v Vongsouvanh; R v Namalauulu [2004] NSWCCA 158 Cited cited 7×
  7. REGINA v KALDOR [2004] NSWCCA 425 Cited cited 41×
  8. REGINA v Warren Alan FORBES [2005] NSWCCA 377 Cited cited 124×
  9. Chahine v R [2006] NSWCCA 179 Cited cited 17×
  10. The Queen v Hillier [2007] HCA 13 Applied or followed cited 167×
  11. TABER, Peter v. REGINA; STYMAN Ian v. REGINA [2007] NSWCCA 116 Cited cited 5×
  12. BJR v R [2008] NSWCCA 43 Cited cited 23×
  13. The Queen v Keenan [2009] HCA 1 Applied or followed cited 43×
  14. BURRELL v REGINA [2009] NSWCCA 193 Applied or followed cited 32×
  15. Rasic v R; Johnny Lee Vella v R; Damien Charles Vella v R [2009] NSWCCA 202 Cited cited 59×
  16. REGINA v CW [2009] NSWSC 1155 Cited cited 4×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.