Pinpoint · Judgment search

Regina v V Camilleri

[2001] NSWCCA 527

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 19 December 2001 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2003: 1 citing judgment 2006: 1 citing judgment 2001 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Regina v Riscuta and Niga [2003] NSWCCA 6 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 13× · judgment
  2. Lozanovski v R [2006] NSWCCA 143 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 10× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (12)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Hodge (1838) 2 Lewin CC 227 Cited cited 4×
  2. Peacock v The King [1911] HCA 66 Cited cited 85×
  3. Martin v Osborne [1936] HCA 23 Cited cited 90×
  4. Plomp v The Queen [1963] HCA 44 Applied or followed cited 98×
  5. Green v The Queen [1971] HCA 55 Cited cited 49×
  6. Grant v The Queen (1975) 11 ALR 503 Cited cited 11×
  7. R v Manunta [1989] SASC 1628 Applied or followed cited 14×
  8. R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 Cited cited 316×
  9. Shepherd v The Queen [1990] HCA 56 Cited cited 315×
  10. Domican v The Queen [1992] HCA 13 Cited cited 152×
  11. Knight v The Queen [1992] HCA 56 Cited cited 85×
  12. R v ABDALLAH [2001] NSWCCA 506 Cited cited 16×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.