Pinpoint · Judgment search

Lozanovski v R

[2006] NSWCCA 143

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 5 May 2006 · Official judgment

Cited by 10 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 9

2007: 2 citing judgments 2008: 1 citing judgment 2010: 2 citing judgments 2017: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2024: 2 citing judgments 2006 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Hamieh v R [2007] NSWCCA 277 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  2. AOUN, Gabriel v. REGINA [2007] NSWCCA 292 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 19× · judgment
  3. R v PGM [2008] NSWCCA 172 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 84× · judgment
  4. DPP v Con Kostakidis [2010] NSWLC 20 Cited Local Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  5. Chivers v R [2010] NSWCCA 134 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  6. R v Hall [2017] NSWCCA 313 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 13× · judgment
  7. TABER v R [2021] NSWDC 60 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  8. R v Hassenein NADERI [2022] NSWDC 534 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  9. Environment Protection Authority v BSV Tyre Recycling Australia Pty Ltd [2024] NSWLEC 63 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · judgment
  10. Environment Protection Authority v Calleija; Environment Protection Authority v Budget Waste Recycling Pty Ltd [2024] NSWLEC 119 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (11)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Ibbs v The Queen [1987] HCA 46 Cited cited 219×
  2. R v Skinner (1993) 72 A Crim R 151 Cited cited 6×
  3. R v V (1998) 99 A Crim R 297 Cited cited 11×
  4. Melbourne v The Queen [1999] HCA 32 Cited cited 113×
  5. Regina -v- Iddles [2000] NSWCCA 128 Cited
  6. Regina v Kennedy [2000] NSWCCA 527 Cited cited 53×
  7. Regina v Moon [2000] NSWCCA 534 Cited cited 116×
  8. Ryan v The Queen [2001] HCA 21 Cited cited 307×
  9. Regina v V Camilleri [2001] NSWCCA 527 Cited cited 2×
  10. Regina v MJR [2002] NSWCCA 129 Cited cited 173×
  11. R v Gent [2005] NSWCCA 370 Cited cited 104×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.