Pinpoint · Judgment search

Regina v Patrick Joseph O'Connor

[2002] NSWCCA 156

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 7 May 2002 · Official judgment

Cited by 8 indexed judgments

All Cited 8

2002: 1 citing judgment 2003: 1 citing judgment 2004: 1 citing judgment 2010: 1 citing judgment 2013: 1 citing judgment 2015: 1 citing judgment 2016: 1 citing judgment 2024: 1 citing judgment 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Regina v Van Nam Nguyen [2002] NSWCCA 183 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 23× · judgment
  2. REGINA v O'DRISCOLL [2003] NSWCCA 281 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  3. R v Studenikin [2004] NSWCCA 164 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 36× · judgment
  4. Wang v R [2010] NSWCCA 319 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 7× · judgment
  5. R v SAKOVITS; R v SAKOVITS [2013] NSWSC 464 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  6. R v Anthony James Dickson (No 18) [2015] NSWSC 268 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 24× · judgment
  7. Dickson v R [2016] NSWCCA 105 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 32× · judgment
  8. R v Zhang [2024] NSWDC 118 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (18)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Applied or followed cited 4,342×
  2. R v Vachalec [1981] NSWCCA 26 Cited cited 69×
  3. [1982] NSWLR 104 Cited
  4. R v Jermyn [1985] 2 NSWLR 194 Cited
  5. R v El Karhani (1990) 21 NSWLR 370 Cited cited 134×
  6. DPP (Cth) v El Karhani [1990] 21 NSWLR 370 Cited cited 4×
  7. Reg v Astill (No. 2) [1992] 64 A Crim R 289 Cited cited 8×
  8. R v Budiman (1998) 102 A Crim R 411 Cited cited 25×
  9. R v Bernier (1998) 102 A Crim R 44 Cited cited 47×
  10. Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57 Cited cited 1,558×
  11. R v Pang [1999] 105 A Crim R 474 Cited cited 5×
  12. R v Cheng [1999] 107 A Crim R 460 Cited
  13. [2001] 47 ATR 317 Cited
  14. Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64 Cited cited 1,044×
  15. R v Cappadona & Anor [2001] NSWCCA 194 Cited cited 8×
  16. REGINA v SIMPSON [2001] NSWCCA 534 Cited cited 682×
  17. R v O'Connor (2002) 129 A Crim R 505 Cited cited 3×
  18. Cameron v The Queen [2002] HCA 6 Cited cited 349×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.