Federal Court of Australia · 15 December 2004 · Official judgment
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[2000] FCA 1331 Cited cited 4×[1989] HCA 62 Applied or followed cited 873×[1996] HCA 6 Applied or followed cited 2,712×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×[1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×(1997) 142 ALR 331 Applied or followed cited 83×[1999] HCA 21 Applied or followed cited 971×[1999] FCA 271 Applied or followed cited 8×(1992) 34 FCR 212 Applied or followed cited 185×(1994) 49 FCR 84 Distinguished cited 5×[1995] HCA 20 Cited cited 502×(1998) 156 ALR 306 Applied or followed cited 4×[2000] FCA 845 Applied or followed cited 231×[1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×[1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×[1999] HCA 21 Cited cited 971×[1999] HCA 14 Cited cited 844×[2000] FCA 213 Cited cited 3×[1997] FCA 105 Cited cited 49×[1947] HCA 53 Cited cited 92×[1979] HCA 32 Cited cited 154×[1988] FCA 423 Cited cited 48×[1991] FCA 92 Cited cited 41×(1998) 89 FCR 1 Cited cited 12×[2000] AATA 61 Cited cited 1×[2001] FCA 570 Cited cited 7×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1997] FCA 1022 Cited cited 41×[1983] HCA 17 Cited cited 424×[1985] HCA 81 Cited cited 1,205×[1986] HCA 39 Cited cited 487×[1989] HCA 44 Cited cited 349×[1998] HCA 67 Cited cited 378×[1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×[1947] EWCA Civ 1 Cited cited 715×(1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Cited cited 804×[1998] HCA 11 Cited cited 2,226×[1999] HCA 21 Applied or followed cited 971×[2000] FCA 845 Cited cited 231×[1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×[1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×[1999] HCA 21 Cited cited 971×[1999] HCA 14 Cited cited 844×[2000] FCA 1455 Cited cited 34×[1948] HCA 16 Cited cited 124×[1955] HCA 16 Cited cited 127×[1993] HCA 47 Cited cited 177×[1998] HCA 67 Applied or followed cited 378×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.