Pinpoint · Judgment search

Pannasara v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs

[2001] FCA 570

Federal Court of Australia · 18 May 2001 · Official judgment

Cited by 7 indexed judgments

All Cited 7

2001: 1 citing judgment 2002: 1 citing judgment 2003: 2 citing judgments 2004: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2001 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Prashar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1573 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 12× · judgment
  2. NAAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 263 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 66× · judgment
  3. VDAU v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 363 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  4. VHAJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 186 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 35× · judgment
  5. Pannasara v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1653 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  6. DTK17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 170 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 7× · judgment
  7. BUK16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCA 558 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (9)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×
  2. Xiang Sheng Li v Refugee Review Tribunal (1996) 45 ALD 193 Applied or followed cited 14×
  3. Bilgin, Ibrahim v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Afffairs [1997] FCA 1022 Cited cited 41×
  4. CDJ v VAJ [1998] HCA 67 Cited cited 378×
  5. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Applied or followed cited 971×
  6. Tharairasa v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2000) 98 FCR 281 Applied or followed cited 12×
  7. Guss v Johnstone [2000] FCA 1455 Cited cited 34×
  8. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Singh [2000] FCA 845 Cited cited 231×
  9. Heslehurst v Government of New Zealand [2001] FCA 202 Cited cited 5×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.