Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Wickham

[2004] NSWCCA 193

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 17 June 2004 · Official judgment

Cited by 168 indexed judgments

All Overruled or disapproved 1 Applied or followed 2 Cited 165

2004: 9 citing judgments 2005: 33 citing judgments 2006: 20 citing judgments, 1 negative 2007: 10 citing judgments 2008: 12 citing judgments 2009: 8 citing judgments 2010: 7 citing judgments 2011: 2 citing judgments 2012: 6 citing judgments 2013: 4 citing judgments 2014: 7 citing judgments 2015: 4 citing judgments 2016: 7 citing judgments 2017: 4 citing judgments 2018: 3 citing judgments 2019: 6 citing judgments 2020: 6 citing judgments 2021: 7 citing judgments 2022: 6 citing judgments 2023: 3 citing judgments 2024: 3 citing judgments 2025: 1 citing judgment 2004 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. REGINA v Michael John SARCASMO [2004] NSWCCA 277 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  2. Inspector Andrew Rowe v Roads and Maritime Services of New South Wales [2012] NSWIRComm 43 Applied or followed Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (19)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Boyd [1975] VR 168 Cited cited 7×
  2. R v Munday (1981) 2 NSWLR 177 Cited cited 29×
  3. R v De Simoni [1981] HCA 31 Cited cited 608×
  4. R v Abbott (1984) 17 A Crim R 355 Cited cited 15×
  5. R v Bailey (1988) 35 A Crim R 458 Cited cited 47×
  6. R v Cartwright (1989) 17 NSWLR 243 Cited cited 208×
  7. R v Goodwin (1990) 51 A Crim R 328 Cited cited 59×
  8. R v Many (1990) 51 A Crim R 54 Cited cited 35×
  9. (1990) 51 A. Crim. R. 328 Cited cited 2×
  10. (1997) 93 A. Crim. R. 301 Cited cited 2×
  11. R v Previtera (1997) 94 A Crim R 76 Cited cited 318×
  12. R v Fordham (1997) 98 A Crim R 359 Cited cited 68×
  13. R v Santamaria (2001) 126 A Crim R 99 Cited
  14. R v Ashton [2002] NSWCCA 498 Cited cited 23×
  15. Weininger v The Queen [2003] HCA 14 Cited cited 242×
  16. Regina v Shankley [2003] NSWCCA 253 Cited cited 68×
  17. REGINA v. KEIR [2004] NSWCCA 106 Cited cited 31×
  18. R v Johnson [2004] NSWCCA 76 Cited cited 69×
  19. R v Bradley [2004] NSWCCA 88 Cited cited 8×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.