Pinpoint · Judgment search

Police v JS

[2006] NSWLC 43

Local Court of NSW · 21 November 2006 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (25)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Wilkins (1988) 38 A Crim R 445 Cited cited 22×
  2. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  3. Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70 Cited cited 841×
  4. Hoare v The Queen [1989] HCA 33 Cited cited 241×
  5. (1991) 55 A Crim R 135 Cited cited 2×
  6. R v WKR (1993) 32 NSWLR 447 Cited cited 47×
  7. Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57 Cited cited 1,558×
  8. (1999) 48 NSWLR 435 Cited
  9. IN THE MATTER OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S APPLICATION (NO 1) UNDER s26 OF THE CRIMINAL APPEAL ACT; R v PONFIELD; R v SCOTT; R v RYAN; R v JOHNSON [1999] NSWCCA 435 Cited cited 222×
  10. Regina v Leslie Kalache [2000] NSWCCA 2 Cited cited 108×
  11. REGINA v SIMPSON [2001] NSWCCA 534 Cited cited 682×
  12. R v Carr [2002] NSWCCA 434 Cited cited 19×
  13. Regina v Weldon; Regina v Carberry [2002] NSWCCA 475 Cited cited 56×
  14. REGINA v DIB [2003] NSWCCA 117 Cited cited 102×
  15. Regina v M A [2004] NSWCCA 92 Cited cited 147×
  16. Regina v Tadrosse [2005] NSWCCA 145 Cited cited 111×
  17. Regina v MSS [2005] NSWCCA 227 Cited cited 9×
  18. Regina v AN [2005] NSWCCA 239 Cited cited 44×
  19. R v LNT [2005] NSWCCA 307 Cited cited 21×
  20. Harrigan v Regina [2005] NSWCCA 449 Cited cited 12×
  21. MARINELLIS v REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 307 Cited cited 29×
  22. D'Amico v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 316 Cited cited 2×
  23. Regina v Higgins [2006] NSWCCA 326 Cited cited 4×
  24. Regina v Michael Lenard; Regina v Michael Fail [2006] NSWCCA 345 Cited cited 2×
  25. ELYARD v. REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 43 Cited cited 96×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.