Pinpoint · Judgment search

Khoury v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue

[2010] NSWADT 13

Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · 15 January 2010 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (13)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Attorney General v Cohen [1937] 1 KB 478 Cited cited 7×
  2. Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Wade [1951] HCA 66 Cited cited 69×
  3. Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Newton (1957) 96 CLR 577 Cited cited 8×
  4. Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Lutovi Investments Pty Ltd (1978) 140 CLR 434 Cited cited 23×
  5. Jeffrey v Commissioner of Stamps (1980) 23 SASR 398 Cited cited 3×
  6. Old Reynella Village Pty Ltd v Commr of Stamps (S.A.) (1989) 20 ATR 1080 Applied or followed cited 2×
  7. Old Reynella Village Pty Ltd v Commr of Stamps (S.A.) (1989) 51 SASR 378 Applied or followed cited 4×
  8. Old Reynella Village Pty Ltd v Commr of Stamps (S.A.) (1989) 89 ATC 4916 Applied or followed cited 3×
  9. Bellinz Pty Ltd & Ors v The Commissioner of Taxation [1998] FCA 615 Cited cited 40×
  10. Trust Co. of Australia Ltd -v- Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2002] NSWADT 21 Cited cited 70×
  11. Chief Commissioner of State Revenue -v- Incise Technologies Pty Ltd & Anor (RD) [2004] NSWADTAP 19 Cited cited 97×
  12. Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Pacific General Securities Ltd & Finmore Holdings Pty Ltd (RD) [2004] NSWADTAP 51 Cited cited 4×
  13. Brianco Nominees Pty Ltd & Ors v Commissioner of State Revenue (Taxation) [2008] VCAT 999 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.