Pinpoint · Judgment search

Austin v Hornby

[2011] NSWSC 1059

Supreme Court of NSW · 8 September 2011 · Official judgment

Cited by 11 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 10

2012: 1 citing judgment 2014: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 1 citing judgment 2021: 2 citing judgments 2022: 4 citing judgments 2025: 1 citing judgment 2011 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Edwards v Harris [2012] NSWSC 1 Applied or followed Supreme Court of NSW · cited 6× · judgment
  2. Aytul Ak-Tankiz v Ferat Ak & Ramazan Ak [2014] NSWSC 1044 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 28× · judgment
  3. E Co v Q [2018] NSWSC 442 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 20× · judgment
  4. Burton v Prior [2019] NSWSC 518 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  5. Nicolitsa Togias v State of New South Wales [2021] NSWSC 1588 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  6. Donnelly v Kempsey Local Aboriginal Land Council [2021] NSWSC 1699 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  7. Stellar Vision Operations Pty Ltd v Hills Health Solutions Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 144 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment
  8. Hanania v Parramatta Wholesale Cars Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 806 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  9. NSW Trustee and Guardian v Togias [2022] NSWCA 225 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  10. Makaritis v Makaritis (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1690 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment
  11. Hellenic Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Makaritis [2025] NSWCA 13 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (64)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Delany v Tenison (1758) 1 ER 1559 Cited cited 5×
  2. Delany v Tenison (1758) 3 Bro PC 659 Cited cited 5×
  3. Lyon v Tweddell (1881) 17 Ch D 529 Cited cited 20×
  4. Allen v Tobias and The Ophelia [1916] 2 AC 206 Cited cited 29×
  5. Allen v Tobias [1958] HCA 13 Applied or followed cited 44×
  6. Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8 Cited cited 2,918×
  7. Pettitt v Pettitt [1970] AC 777 Cited cited 44×
  8. Gissing v Gissing [1970] UKHL 3 Cited cited 94×
  9. Allen v Snyder [1977] 2 NSWLR 685 Cited cited 43×
  10. Mallet v Mallet [1984] HCA 21 Cited cited 72×
  11. Muschinski v Dodds [1985] HCA 78 Cited cited 413×
  12. Norbis v Norbis (1986) 10 Fam LR 819 Cited cited 9×
  13. Grant v Edwards [1986] Ch 638 Cited cited 50×
  14. Norbis v Norbis [1986] HCA 17 Cited cited 255×
  15. Dwyer v Kaljo (1987) 11 Fam LR 785 Cited cited 16×
  16. Baumgartner v Baumgartner [1987] HCA 59 Cited cited 293×
  17. (1988) 11 Adelaide Law Review 370 Cited cited 2×
  18. Green v Green (1989) 17 NSWLR 343 Cited cited 92×
  19. Davey v Lee (1990) 13 Fam LR 688 Cited cited 44×
  20. Miller v Sutherland (1990) 14 Fam LR 416 Cited cited 9×
  21. Gazzola v Gazzola [1990] HCA 13 Cited cited 3×
  22. Black v Black (1991) 15 Fam LR 109 Cited cited 33×
  23. Beavan v Fallshaw (1992) 15 Fam LR 686 Cited cited 7×
  24. Beavan v Fallshaw (1992) 15 FamLR 686 Cited
  25. Bryson v Bryant (1992) 29 NSWLR 188 Cited cited 37×
  26. Singer v Berghouse [1994] HCA 40 Cited cited 981×
  27. Stowe v Stowe (1995) 15 WAR 363 Cited cited 8×
  28. Wallace v Stanford (1995) 19 Fam LR 430 Cited cited 11×
  29. Green v Robinson (1995) 36 NSWLR 96 Cited cited 42×
  30. Wallace v Stanford (1995) 37 NSWLR 1 Cited cited 39×
  31. Callaghan v Callaghan (1995) 64 SASR 396 Cited cited 4×
  32. Commonwealth v McLean [1996] NSWSC 657 Cited cited 82×
  33. Evans v Marmont (1997) 21 Fam LR 760 Cited cited 11×
  34. Evans v Marmont [1997] NSWSC 331 Applied or followed cited 129×
  35. Bathurst City Council v PWC Properties Pty Ltd [1998] HCA 59 Cited cited 96×
  36. Giumelli v Giumelli [1999] HCA 10 Cited cited 296×
  37. Jackson v Jackson [1999] NSWSC 229 Cited cited 3×
  38. McDONALD v STELZER [2000] NSWCA 302 Cited cited 17×
  39. JONES v. GRECH [2001] NSWCA 208 Cited cited 59×
  40. Nguyen v Scheiff [2002] NSWSC 151 Cited cited 10×
  41. Parianos v Melluish (Trustee) [2003] FCA 190 Cited cited 16×
  42. West v Mead [2003] NSWSC 161 Cited cited 105×
  43. Little v Saunders [2004] NSWSC 655 Cited cited 7×
  44. Khattar v Wiese (2005) 12 BPR 23 Cited cited 138×
  45. Howlett v. Neilson [2005] NSWCA 149 Applied or followed cited 54×
  46. SELMORE v BULL [2005] NSWCA 365 Cited cited 9×
  47. CHANTER v CATTS [2005] NSWCA 411 Applied or followed cited 43×
  48. Shepherd v Doolan & OrsShepherd v Doolan & Anor; Est. Doolan [2005] NSWSC 42 Cited cited 70×
  49. Kardos v Sarbutt [2006] NSWCA 11 Applied or followed cited 64×
  50. Ross v Elderfield [2006] NSWCA 192 Cited cited 6×
  51. Bilous v Mudaliar & 1 Or; Mudaliar v Bilous & 1 Or [2006] NSWCA 38 Cited cited 60×
  52. Vollmer v Hauber Davidson [2006] NSWCA 79 Cited cited 12×
  53. Cetojevic v Cetojevic [2006] NSWSC 431 Cited cited 75×
  54. Kiwi Munchies Pty Limited v Stern & Ors [2006] NSWSC 432 Applied or followed cited 2×
  55. Manns v Kennedy [2007] NSWCA 217 Cited cited 31×
  56. Cetojevic & Anor. v. Cetojevic [2007] NSWCA 33 Cited cited 24×
  57. Sharpless v McKibbin [2007] NSWSC 1498 Cited cited 27×
  58. Liquor National Wholesale Pty Ltd v The Redrock Co Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 392 Applied or followed cited 15×
  59. Paino v Paino [2008] NSWCA 276 Applied or followed cited 43×
  60. McKay & anor v McKay [2008] NSWSC 177 Cited cited 20×
  61. Friend v Brooker [2009] HCA 21 Cited cited 89×
  62. Ryan v Kalocsay [2010] NSWSC 620 Cited cited 7×
  63. Davies v Dabela [2011] NSWSC 12 Applied or followed cited 2×
  64. Smith v Pearson [2011] NSWSC 600 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.