Pinpoint · Judgment search

Police v Poolman

[2014] NSWLC 3

Local Court of NSW · 18 February 2014 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (26)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 Cited cited 385×
  2. R v Rowe (1996) 89 A Crim R 467 Cited cited 16×
  3. Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57 Cited cited 1,558×
  4. Regina v Fahda [1999] NSWCCA 267 Cited cited 110×
  5. Gallegos v R [1999] WASCA 191 Cited cited 3×
  6. R v Berry [2000] NSWCCA 451 Cited cited 5×
  7. Regina v Greene [2001] NSWCCA 258 Cited cited 9×
  8. R v Edigarov [2001] NSWCCA 436 Cited cited 57×
  9. Ugle v R [2001] WASCA 268 Cited cited 3×
  10. Regina v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Cited cited 299×
  11. Regina v Quach [2002] NSWCCA 173 Cited cited 4×
  12. REGINA v DUNN [2004] NSWCCA 41 Cited cited 40×
  13. Attorney-General for Tasmania v O [2004] TASSC 53 Cited cited 3×
  14. Regina v MMK [2006] NSWCCA 272 Cited cited 183×
  15. R v Hamid [2006] NSWCCA 302 Cited cited 101×
  16. Regina v Stambolis [2006] NSWCCA 56 Cited cited 71×
  17. Cahyadi v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 1 Cited cited 601×
  18. Nguyen v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 14 Cited cited 39×
  19. Hiron v R [2007] NSWCCA 336 Cited cited 23×
  20. Vragovic v R [2007] NSWCCA 46 Cited cited 15×
  21. SHAW, Jason Robert v R [2008] NSWCCA 58 Cited cited 20×
  22. Blundell v R [2008] NSWCCA 92 Cited cited 7×
  23. REGINA v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115 Cited cited 143×
  24. Rios v Regina [2012] NSWCCA 8 Cited cited 16×
  25. Melbom v R [2013] NSWCCA 210 Cited cited 15×
  26. Montero v R [2013] NSWCCA 214 Cited cited 19×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.