Pinpoint · Judgment search

Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Pelletier

[2014] NSWLC 9

Local Court of NSW · 15 August 2014 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Cited 4

2016: 2 citing judgments 2017: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. NSW Police v Nash [2016] NSWLC 3 Cited Local Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Mansouri [2016] NSWLC 17 Cited Local Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  3. R v Mohamed Abbasher Fageer [2017] NSWLC 18 Cited Local Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  4. R v Haydon Charles Ready [2021] NSWDC 341 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (13)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Rushby [1977] 1 NSWLR 594 Cited cited 226×
  2. R v Boswell (1984) 3 All ER 353 Cited cited 4×
  3. R v Pyritz (1998) 29 MVR 90 Cited cited 5×
  4. Regina v Dhanhoa [2000] NSWCCA 257 Cited cited 13×
  5. Regina v Taylor [2000] NSWCCA 442 Cited cited 26×
  6. Regina v Foster [2001] NSWCCA 215 Cited cited 47×
  7. Regina v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Cited cited 299×
  8. Regina v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131 Cited cited 907×
  9. Hughes v Regina [2008] NSWCCA 48 Cited cited 33×
  10. R v Michael Barbetta [2008] NSWSC 688 Cited cited 12×
  11. R v Robert Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102 Cited cited 504×
  12. Tsakonas v R [2009] NSWCCA 258 Cited cited 11×
  13. Bonsu v R [2009] NSWCCA 316 Cited cited 12×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.