Supreme Court of NSW · 1 May 2015 · Official judgment
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[2008] NSWSC 936 Cited cited 11×[1936] HCA 40 Applied or followed cited 4,342×(1993) 32 NSWLR 683 Cited cited 595×[1998] HCA 57 Cited cited 1,558×[2000] HCA 54 Cited cited 929×[1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×(1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Cited cited 804×[1999] HCA 3 Cited cited 463×[1999] HCA 29 Cited cited 405×[2001] HCA 64 Cited cited 1,044×[2002] NSWCCA 518 Cited cited 871×[1981] HCA 31 Cited cited 608×(1993) 70 A Crim R 368 Cited cited 195×[1999] HCA 54 Cited cited 1,119×[2002] NSWCCA 58 Cited cited 197×[2013] NSWCCA 107 Cited cited 2×[2000] NSWCCA 317 Cited cited 198×(1989) 44 A Crim R 185 Cited cited 2×(2005) 79 ALJR 104 Cited cited 2×[2008] NSWSC 936 Cited cited 11×[1936] HCA 40 Applied or followed cited 4,342×[1998] HCA 57 Cited cited 1,558×[2000] HCA 54 Cited cited 929×[2001] HCA 64 Cited cited 1,044×[2012] NSWCCA 44 Cited cited 340×[2001] NSWCCA 534 Cited cited 682×[2004] NSWCCA 131 Cited cited 907×[2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×[2011] HCA 39 Cited cited 1,670×[2014] NSWSC 586 Cited cited 3×[1998] HCA 57 Cited cited 1,558×[2004] NSWCCA 131 Cited cited 907×[1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×(1995) 84 A Crim R 67 Cited cited 454×[2000] NSWCCA 309 Cited cited 2,216×[2001] HCA 64 Cited cited 1,044×[2008] NSWSC 936 Cited cited 11×[1936] HCA 40 Applied or followed cited 4,342×[1998] HCA 57 Cited cited 1,558×[2000] HCA 54 Cited cited 929×[2001] HCA 64 Cited cited 1,044×[2011] HCA 39 Cited cited 1,670×[1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×[1998] HCA 57 Cited cited 1,558×[2004] NSWCCA 131 Cited cited 907×[2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×[2012] NSWSC 1357 Cited cited 2×(1987) 11 NSWLR 277 Cited cited 10×(1992) 28 NSWLR 502 Cited cited 35×[1998] HCA 57 Cited cited 1,558×[2002] NSWLEC 102 Cited cited 10×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.