Pinpoint · Judgment search

Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 5)

[2016] FCA 444

Federal Court of Australia · 29 April 2016 · Official judgment

Cited by 5 indexed judgments

All Cited 5

2016: 2 citing judgments 2017: 3 citing judgments 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 6) [2016] FCA 706 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 7) [2016] FCA 991 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  3. Coretell Pty Ltd v Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 54 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 12× · judgment
  4. Coretell Pty Ltd v Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 122 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 1× · judgment
  5. Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 7) [2017] FCA 1469 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (19)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Re Sturmer and Town of Beaverton (1912) 2 DLR 501 Cited cited 2×
  2. Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd [1992] HCA 28 Cited cited 442×
  3. Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 536 Cited cited 130×
  4. Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 801 Cited cited 817×
  5. John S Hayes & Associates Pty Limited v Kimberley-Clarke Australia Pty Limited (1994) 52 FCR 203 Cited cited 4×
  6. Farmitalia Carlo Erba SrL v Delta West Pty Ltd [1994] FCA 88 Cited cited 32×
  7. Re Wilcox; Ex parte Ventura Industries Pty Ltd (No 2) (1996) 72 FCR 152 Cited cited 4×
  8. Vestris v Cashman (1998) 72 SASR 449 Cited cited 43×
  9. Hurst and Devlin v Education Queensland (No 2) [2005] FCA 793 Cited cited 5×
  10. Pacific Publications Pty Limited v Next Publishing Pty Limited [2005] FCA 971 Cited cited 5×
  11. Cirillo v Consolidated Press Property Ltd (formerly known as Citicorp Australia Limited) (No 2) [2007] FCA 179 Cited cited 60×
  12. Barrett Property Group Ltd v Metricon Homes Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] FCA 1823 Cited cited 23×
  13. Jianshe Southern Pty Ltd (ACN 007 031 905) v Turnbull Cooktown Pty Ltd (ACN 069 894 275) (No 2) [2007] FCA 903 Cited cited 21×
  14. Access For All Alliance (Hervey Bay) Inc v Hervey Bay City Council [2007] FCA 974 Cited cited 8×
  15. Probiotec Limited v The University of Melbourne [2008] FCAFC 5 Cited cited 57×
  16. Manday Investments Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2011] FCA 681 Cited cited 4×
  17. Labelmakers Group Pty Ltd v LL Force Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] FCA 1227 Cited
  18. Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 723 Cited
  19. Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 4) [2015] FCA 1372 Cited cited 18×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.