Pinpoint · Judgment search

Anderson v DKH18

[2018] FCA 1571

Federal Court of Australia · 19 October 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 11 indexed judgments

All Cited 11

2019: 3 citing judgments 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 4 citing judgments 2023: 2 citing judgments 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Anderson v GPY18 [2019] FCA 954 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 10× · judgment
  2. Anderson v DKH18 (No 2) [2019] FCA 1352 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Anderson v BYF19 [2019] FCA 1959 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 9× · judgment
  4. Lusty v CRA20 [2020] FCA 1737 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 12× · judgment
  5. Anderson v EVA20 [2021] FCA 457 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  6. Australian Crime Commission v DTO21 [2022] FCA 288 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  7. Sage v CFS22 [2022] FCA 1023 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  8. Sage v CFT22 [2022] FCA 1028 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  9. DTO21 v Australian Crime Commission [2022] FCAFC 190 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 3× · judgment
  10. Lusty v CVA22 [2023] FCA 130 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  11. Sage v AYI23 [2023] FCA 1336 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (14)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Thelander v Woodward [1981] 1 NSWLR 644 Cited cited 6×
  2. Von Doussa v Owens (No 3) [1982] SASC 6369 Cited cited 26×
  3. Wood v Galea [1995] NSWSC 100 Cited cited 17×
  4. Royal Commissioner v Staunton [1995] NSWSC 45 Cited cited 3×
  5. Wood v Staunton (No 5) (1996) 86 A Crim R 183 Cited cited 97×
  6. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v INFO4PC.com Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 949 Cited cited 53×
  7. Hughes v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [2004] FCAFC 319 Cited cited 25×
  8. Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Design Elegance Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 83 Cited cited 61×
  9. Principal Registrar of Supreme Court of NSW v Tran [2006] NSWSC 1183 Cited cited 19×
  10. R v Bilal Razzak [2006] NSWSC 1366 Cited cited 24×
  11. Hannaford (an examiner under the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002) v HH [2010] FCA 1214 Cited cited 15×
  12. Hannaford (an examiner under section 46B of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002) v HH (No 2) [2012] FCA 560 Cited cited 13×
  13. Anderson v XLVII [2015] FCA 19 Cited cited 18×
  14. Sage, an examiner appointed under s 46B of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 v ZZ (No 2) [2015] FCA 450 Cited cited 6×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.